seledorian
New Member
'I live and work in a national park in California. I have a doctors recommendation for medical marijuana, aka a 'porp 215' or just a '215'. I was reading the Code of Federal Regulations and found 36CFR2.35 interesting. It states that:
"(b) Controlled substances. The following are prohibited:"
"(2) The possession of a controlled substance, unless such substance
was obtained by the possessor directly, or pursuant to a valid
prescription or order, from a practitioner acting in the course of
professional practice or otherwise allowed by Federal or State law."
My interpretation of this is that medical marijuana is allowed in national parks that are within states that allow such medications.
Is this correct?
How valid or binding is the Code of Federal Regulations in the legal system?
Can this be used as a defense?
"(b) Controlled substances. The following are prohibited:"
"(2) The possession of a controlled substance, unless such substance
was obtained by the possessor directly, or pursuant to a valid
prescription or order, from a practitioner acting in the course of
professional practice or otherwise allowed by Federal or State law."
My interpretation of this is that medical marijuana is allowed in national parks that are within states that allow such medications.
Is this correct?
How valid or binding is the Code of Federal Regulations in the legal system?
Can this be used as a defense?