M
Mark Beaver
Guest
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
I have been charged with "failure to register" concerning Megan's Law registration requirements.
First problem: PA has had 4 versions ML1, ML2, ML3, ML4 and also SORNA.
Second problem: my public defender. Originally my case was a clear win for dismisal. Now after the first "trial" apperance, he seems to have major questions about the outcome.
Third problem: getting the right information into the court record from the beginning.
During the first hearing, it was determined that the arguement would be to "dismiss" the charge or not.
So we are arguing to dimiss.
My first arguement to dismiss is Applicability.
My second arguement is that I have a vested interest in the statute in effect at the time of my sentencing. Which was 09/16/1995 in Florida. Statute 800.04. PA equilivent being 3126(a)(8)
Please see PA_SexOffences_Tiers.pdf A nice simple document
note: only ten years or life registration until 12/20/2012 SORNA
ML history in PA. ML 1 was declared unconstitutional due to making determinations as being an
"offender" or "predator" without any dueyearsSORNA
ML2 has not been found to be unconstitutional. It has been repealed as of SORNA affective date.
ML3 unconstitutional due to violating "single subject clause". Yet the PA State Trouper refered to it during the first hearing. Courious, interesting.
ML4 never reached it affective date before 12/20/2012 and SORNA became controling and retroactive. Except in the SORNA Applicable section 9799.13(3) which provides for treatment of offenders that had fulfilled the required registration period.
Having provided this information and create a complex string of statute changes would you be so kind as provide a brief to get the failure to register dismissed.
This case will effect the remainder of my life.
Personal information removed by your online, friendly, helpful MOD.
We don't want your identity stolen, your life threatened, or either this site or you to be HARASSED.
You're welcome, Just Another Online MOD
First problem: PA has had 4 versions ML1, ML2, ML3, ML4 and also SORNA.
Second problem: my public defender. Originally my case was a clear win for dismisal. Now after the first "trial" apperance, he seems to have major questions about the outcome.
Third problem: getting the right information into the court record from the beginning.
During the first hearing, it was determined that the arguement would be to "dismiss" the charge or not.
So we are arguing to dimiss.
My first arguement to dismiss is Applicability.
My second arguement is that I have a vested interest in the statute in effect at the time of my sentencing. Which was 09/16/1995 in Florida. Statute 800.04. PA equilivent being 3126(a)(8)
Please see PA_SexOffences_Tiers.pdf A nice simple document
note: only ten years or life registration until 12/20/2012 SORNA
ML history in PA. ML 1 was declared unconstitutional due to making determinations as being an
"offender" or "predator" without any dueyearsSORNA
ML2 has not been found to be unconstitutional. It has been repealed as of SORNA affective date.
ML3 unconstitutional due to violating "single subject clause". Yet the PA State Trouper refered to it during the first hearing. Courious, interesting.
ML4 never reached it affective date before 12/20/2012 and SORNA became controling and retroactive. Except in the SORNA Applicable section 9799.13(3) which provides for treatment of offenders that had fulfilled the required registration period.
Having provided this information and create a complex string of statute changes would you be so kind as provide a brief to get the failure to register dismissed.
This case will effect the remainder of my life.
Personal information removed by your online, friendly, helpful MOD.
We don't want your identity stolen, your life threatened, or either this site or you to be HARASSED.
You're welcome, Just Another Online MOD
