Conroysajoke
New Member
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
I was charged and convicted of one punch aggravated assault after 3 men converged on my one friend(testified to by prosecutions witnesses) It was also testified that the initial guy from their side approached my friend first. In short, without adding the 37 story changes from their testimony, the guy supposedly sustained two significant injuries from one punch which made it aggravated assault. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Cervical Sprain. According to the medical records the prosecution entered as evidence the hemorrhage was actually suffered a week prior to our fight, as a ct scan comparison showed. And the cervical sprain didn't exist as test showed everything to be normal. When I showed this to my lawyer he refused to bring it up saying the will not reconsider this newly found evidence. This information is just the tip of the iceberg as far as my lawyers ethical violations are concerned, but can anyone explain a possible excuse for his stance?