i have an argument witht The state of Arizona licensing of contractors law. I understand they have the right to license occupations but in doing so they must stay within constitutional limits in doing so ?
1. all persons in like cirrcumstance must be traeted the same, this is done ( all Doctors Lawyers even Hairdressers tested as indivuals in Az,) this is constitutional but in licensing of contractors the state choose a different way. If a person wants to become a contractor they must tested pay the fee if they can not pass the test or do not have the 4 years of experiance in the trade they my hire a Qualifying party to test for them This person would come from what ever trade the would be contractor is looking to get into
(plumber carpenter ect) 1.a Trade persons and contractors are different classes its been proven in several case so this not only not like cirrcumstance but class legisaltion mixing classes?
The state says if a carpenters wants to make a contract with someone they are limited to 750.00 gross meateral and labor
if the job requires a permit the trade person can not do this also
Title 42 Section 1981 1983 Federal code civil right gives all person within the jurisdiction of the U.S the right to make contracts 1983 says the state can not make unequal law
The law or statues do not treat even the person that they are to protect equally the state has a fund that covers contractor up to 100,000.00 and or 20,000.00 per contract after the 100,000
runs out the consumer after their money must take their problem to court if they don't get to the door first.
One other problem a law must have the abiltiy to reach the goal of protection if only one person is tested they can not over see the non tested person on job sites all over the city or state so no real protestion if the test is not over seeing the untested
several person lawyers and lay person have told me that this still provdeds a resposiable party in case of and injury or wrong doing
but that is not what licensing is for licensing is to prvent the injury from happening ? your opinon on this please
1. all persons in like cirrcumstance must be traeted the same, this is done ( all Doctors Lawyers even Hairdressers tested as indivuals in Az,) this is constitutional but in licensing of contractors the state choose a different way. If a person wants to become a contractor they must tested pay the fee if they can not pass the test or do not have the 4 years of experiance in the trade they my hire a Qualifying party to test for them This person would come from what ever trade the would be contractor is looking to get into
(plumber carpenter ect) 1.a Trade persons and contractors are different classes its been proven in several case so this not only not like cirrcumstance but class legisaltion mixing classes?
The state says if a carpenters wants to make a contract with someone they are limited to 750.00 gross meateral and labor
if the job requires a permit the trade person can not do this also
Title 42 Section 1981 1983 Federal code civil right gives all person within the jurisdiction of the U.S the right to make contracts 1983 says the state can not make unequal law
The law or statues do not treat even the person that they are to protect equally the state has a fund that covers contractor up to 100,000.00 and or 20,000.00 per contract after the 100,000
runs out the consumer after their money must take their problem to court if they don't get to the door first.
One other problem a law must have the abiltiy to reach the goal of protection if only one person is tested they can not over see the non tested person on job sites all over the city or state so no real protestion if the test is not over seeing the untested
several person lawyers and lay person have told me that this still provdeds a resposiable party in case of and injury or wrong doing
but that is not what licensing is for licensing is to prvent the injury from happening ? your opinon on this please