T
Tertullian
Guest
I am considering a career in appellate law practice, and am wondering how argumentation, both in briefs and oral arguments, works in appellate law. Must an appellate lawyer use a the same basic arguments for any given topic (if he specializes in free speech trials, for example), or does he ? Is appellate argumentation about applying a basic argumentation concept to (i.e. for free speech questions), or crafting a creative argument from the constitution and logic each time? Any other explanations of the appellate argumentation process you can offer are appreciated!