Almost mirror image: class action Petition details fraud and deliberate deceit

[KCGirl]

I have found several cases where Midland Funding has been brought to account for their fraudulent acts. Also one is underway in the form of a class action suit in Washington which I cannot join of course since I live in Missouri.

I actually managed to get an email from one of the attorneys in Washington and he asked for my documents which I scanned and sent him and I have not heard back since then but I'm sure he is very busy.

My case is essentially the same as what he has outlined.

His petition is amazing to me as it outlines in incredible detail how deliberate the acts of deception are and to what length they go and how many people they affect across the U.S.

Can I do my own case in federal court here in Missouri and if so what would I need to consider?

Anyway here are some facts and references:

http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/11/15/31828.htm

View attachment 319

 

[KCGirl]

The affidavits:

6.21.
6.22.
6.23.
6.24.
6.25. 6.26.
6.27.
Generally each day the Encore Defendants assign approximately ten (10) to twelve (12) employees as a "legal specialist" or "specialist" to sign affidavits. Each affiant ("legal specialist" or "specialist") signs between One Hundred (100) to Four Hundred (400) affidavits a day.

Each affiant ("legal specialist" or "specialist") signs each affidavit without personal knowledge of the facts and statements contained in the affidavits. Which affiant ("legal specialist" or "specialist") signs which particular affidavit is randomly determined based on when the affidavits are printed rather than any knowledge of the account that is being verified. Ivan Jimenez is an employee or former employee of MCMI. Mr. Jimenez testified under oath that he personally signed between "200 and 400" of such Affidavits [MCMI "Form 400"] per day. See Midland Funding LLC v. Brent, 644 F.Supp.2d 961, 966-967 (ND OH, 2009).

Mr. Jimenez testified under oath that he has no personal knowledge of the facts he is attesting to on behalf of the Encore Defendants. See Midland Funding LLC v. Brent, 644 F.Supp.2d 961, 966-969 (ND OH, 2009).

The affidavit in my own case came from the same company, same place in White Cloud MN

 

[KCGirl]

Instead of providing actual admissible evidence of the proof required in a breach of contract lawsuit, the Encore defendants (with the knowledge of the Suttell attorney defendants) hire collection agency employees as "Robo-signers". The Robo-signers sign several hundred affidavits a day falsely claiming that they are a business records custodian with personal knowledge of the facts, They falsely claim in the affidavit knowledge of the assignment(s) of the debt, the amount of the debt, the interest rate, the default of the debt, the alleged credit card terms and conditions, and the record keeping procedures of every bank in America.

This is disgusting to me that they use any means at all to collect money from thousands and thousands of people not just in Missouri but everywhere else in the U.S. And my state of Missouri and this judge in my case have turned a blind eye to what they are doing.

This company clearly continues to use their deceptive and fraudulent practices and yet I have now a judgment against me and it is totally wrong.

I feel misused to say the least as I was attempting to defend myself and it was taken from me to defend myself.

http://oh.findacase.com/research/wf...ac.\FDCT\NOH\2010\20100222_0000285.NOH.htm/qx