Search results

The time is long past to raise paternity issues. You will not be able to force them to do anything of that nature.

I can guarantee that your lender would be upset. I suspect your mortgage contract has a prohibition on such without lender permission and even if it didn't it most likely has a due on sale clause that will be triggered with the deeding necessary to divide the property. Notwithstanding all...

Understand that a lady bird deed is revocable. Your mom could change her mind at any time while she is alive. Since it is revocable, if some situation changes (nasty divorce, substantial credit issue), the property may indeed be attached. Still, it may be the best bet for the two of you...

It probably was quoted as given. The answer here isn't like a "yes or no" to whether the employee is liable, but a discussion on how to determine if he is or not.

Nothing starts with phone calls. If you had legal action, you'd have paper delivered to you.

It means that there was some technical defect in the way the corporation was created, but it was handled sufficiently as if it were to treat it as one in a legal action. If the issue of it being a de facto corporation is already decided, the de facto part is irrelevant. You move on to...

Huh? You've said nothing that makes any sense. Temporary or not isn't a criteria that makes things constitutional or not. What aspect of the constitution do you thnk takes this out of the state's hands? Just about anything not reserved to the federal government by the Constitution...

Being annoyed with politicians doesn't mean things are unconstitutional. Sometimes the right decisions are unpleasant ones. The populace has become a bunch of whiny children when they don't get their way and this was intensified by having a two year old in the White House for four years...

A minor can't file anything. An adult who has sufficient relationship to the minor can apply to represent the minor's interests.

Tell us how it is NOT constitutional? Just because you don't like something doesn't make it unconstitutional. It doesn't seem to treat citizens of non-Hawaii differently than those of Hawaii (that would be unconstitutional) nor places any unconstitutional restraints on commerce.

A real clinical depression diagnisis is a disability under ADA (and similar California) law. Your ESA is an accommodation that should be allowed unless there is some overly compelling reason why not, and you can demonstrate some connection between the animal and your condition. The landlord...

You have to look at the case law on this. NC Courts have determined that these sort of marriages are not void, but perhaps voidable. It has been invalidated in bigamy cases ( State v. Lynch, 310 NC 479 (1980)) as well as divorce cases ( Duncan v. Duncan, 232 NC App 369 (2014). Pickard v...

I'm sorry for your loss, but you don't get ownership rights either for caring for the previous owner or making repairs or improvements to the house. There is nothing to "apply" for. The remains of the estates after any debts are taken care of go to the children equally if your mother died...

I ran into this problem myself. Fortunately, even though my checks were direct deposited I had all the paystubs accumulated in my desk. I reconstructed the vacation time due from a few years of old stubs.

The lien is not extinguished just because someone dies. If your grandma had a judgment against her (or her estate), the lien will remain until the judgment is satisfied. Consult an attorney, to see what the facts are.

It's not necessarily required. It matters what the association bylaws and other documents say. Best suggestion is that you see an attorney. If there are other like-minded residents, you can band together to split the costs.

There's no obligation for whoever owns (or controls) the property to allow you back in regardless of what transpired. Mutual brawling isn't self defense. Threatening to file a police report largely means nothing. If the police do contact you, I'd advise that you not talk to them without...

What it specifically means is that the deed makes not warranty about there not being any such encumbrance. The validity of the easement exists REGARDLESS of whether that clause is there or not.

Again, it depends how the easement is worded. Just because an existing use of it didn't encroach on a property OR the fact that there was subdivision or additional structures that might want power, doesn't mean the easement doesn't still apply. Again, you are wrong. SUBDIVISION and SALES...

Sales of property and subdivision don't typically extinguish easements. The comments about existing easements in the subsequent deeds don't mean anything to the easement, they just state that deed isn't making any warranty about there not being any. You'll need to get an attorney to review...