Search results

We can't help you if you're going to keep changing the story. First, the trucks and vehicles are worth more than $15,000, now the whole estate is under $10,000. You need proper legal help before you get into serious criminal trouble.

As posted on the other forum, the value of these vehicles in aggregate disqualifies you from using that form. You're going to have to probate the estate and have the person with the appropriate authority (letters of administration or whatever) transfer the titles on behalf of the estate.

It says if you sue them you can't get more than $250,000 and certain types of damages as stated can't be recovered at all. Whether that is enforceable and whether it is something you should be concerned about is something you should discuss with your attorney.

Huh? Mom being the grantee on a quit claim she signs makes little sense. It's the person who has ownership interest in the property who has to sign the conveyance if it actually conveys anything. Verbal means nothing with regard to real estate.

Not following your employer's directions is called willful misconduct and will disqualify you from unemployment.

Eight years or when the child turns 18, whichever is later, I would suspect. Understand that both parents are responsible for the support of their children regardless of what the marital situation is. The apportionment of that is determined by statute.

Most "home inspectors" couldn't find a major defect if it bit them in the rear during the inspection. They serve as little more than a nuisance negotiation tool late in the purchase process. If you suspect something might be wrong, you need to bring in someone skilled in that particular field...

And I'll amplify that. It grants only that interest that the grantor has AT THE TIME the quit claim is signed. If she signed the deed before she actually had any ownership interest, it conveyed nothing, even if she subsequently gets it through probate.

I don't know how I could make it clearer. I never said the I-90 asked about criminal activity, for I know it does not. The biometrics appointment that is necessary for the renewal will run your fingerprints through the FBI. Arizona setting aside does not result in an expungement. It...

You can very much be subject to trouble for trying to renew the green card. The 'biometrics' can very much trigger an investigation into your criminal history that's happened in the interim. You could end up being deported. Even if your crimes end up terminating your permanent residence ...

It should be better now. The problem was a link to a malware site was detected. These often come either from errant ad insertions or someone posting spam with the link. If they had a system administrator they would have deleted the link and logged into the google stats site and forced a...

In the trade, Water S. with a black box about the size of the word Taylor. He calls his winery Bully Hill so as not to infringe on Taylor.

It's unclear where you are and I'm not sure how Italian law is, but I can tell you that if you were a US resident alien, you'd still be reliant on your home country's passport being valid (the green card means nothing without it). If you're a fugitive, there's a chance your US passport might...

So? The fact that it is your name doesn't give you rights to infringe on other's marks. I know of a number of people who can't use their name at all (Walter S. Taylor is a classic example, but there are more) because of an already famous competing mark.

You can by the home and give him a lease-to-purchase option. That will allow him to build "equity" but gives you the most flexibility.

I'd start with the court where you got your divorce. Were there children involved? Was the custodial parent ever on public assitance?

You can expect a civil demand from Costco in addition to your criminal issues. Costco is one of the few chains that I know of that actually pursue these claims in court. This is going to cost you a couple of orders of magnitude over what the purchase price. The ban is FOREVER and for all...

As of March 29, 2019 Michigan IS in the DLC. MCL 3.1072 and 1073. AAMVA's DLC survey was dated October 2018. Just missed the change.

Good point. It's possible that until COVID gets under control a border might shutdown stranding you out of the country. Don't cut that six month time anywhere near close. Arguments that you couldn't get back aren't necessarily compelling.

"Represented in the past" doesn't mean that representation constitutes a current conflict of interest.