Search results

Did this occur during school hours? What is the school's policy on students having and using cell phones during the school day?

Book, homework?? Who knows... I find it mighty odd to dredge up and repost old threads for either reason, but I can't think of any other. Just strange. :nuts

Sorry, I'm not sure if the agreement has to be filed or not before you can start the count-down. I imagine that an initial consultation with an attorney can clear that up, and many offer a free first consultation. Good luck!

If you're concerned about the fault grounds and willing to wait a year, you can file for legal separation and then file for divorce after one year of living apart. No additional grounds are needed in that case.

This ebooks character is reposting old threads. I've already reported.

This is from a year-old thread that was asked and answered. I don't know why this OP, or really NOP, is posting this stuff, but don't waste your time.

Ummm... This post sounds vaguely familiar, especially the first couple sentences of the 2nd paragraph. I seem to recall the 'ear' and 'corner' parts from an old thread, either here or some other site. Also, I see that one of your threads today gives the location as Iowa, while the other is...

Just curious.... Are you upset that he has so much visitation, or that he isn't always able to be with his son during his visitation? Frankly, I doubt that he will be penalized for WORKING during some hours of his visitation, especially when the child's grandmother cares for the baby in his...

Isn't the scruff the skin at the back of the dog's neck??

Army Judge, this is her reply to you, including additional questions. She began a new thread, so I copied/pasted.

How many points do we get for answering correctly?

I have to spread the rep around before I can give it to dee dub again, hence the thanks. LOL

Here's the link for your original thread: http://www.thelaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41394

Jill, you've started 2 threads instead of replying on your original thread. It's easier for us, and you'll get better advice, if you keep all your postings on the same topic in the same thread. Please go back to the original and post your reply.

I think OP is trying to respond to her previous thread. Jill, go back to your original thread, and reply there. Then, please delete this thread. It's confusing. Thanks and good luck. I too am sorry for your loss.

I'm confused. I believe what I bolded in your statement is what I originally said. When I asked the question in the first part of the quote, you said that is correct. That's contradictory, unless I'm missing something. I'm confused here too. If he dies while married to this prospective wife...

Yes, I do understand that the stepchild is a natural child to the mother. I guess I should have been clearer: .. unless the stepdad dies first without a will. Man's stepchild can inherit through child's mother. Are you saying the if the stepdad dies first, the wife inherits all, then the...

... unless the stepdad dies first without a will. Stepchild can inherit through mother. Regarding the single part, I really don't believe I would be offended by the inheritance exclusion, as long as the explanation and reasoning was presented in a more concise and sensitive way. Cause yeah...

Did you also use his Dept of Corrections number to search him on the DOC site? There may be more information there. **You can also use the links on the DOC page for your FIL's info to search the court records of the county where he was tried. The county and the court case number should be...

To the best of my knowledge, it means that he was not actually declared guilty, but he was not declared innocent either. Adjudication may have been withheld for a number of reasons, I believe, but the requirement for registration speaks to his guilt as far as the State of Florida is concerned.