Search results

I beleive, in that situtation, without a court order denying you of your property, they would have to have a hearing to deprive you of that vehicle. I'm sure the city and state have their little rules. But, you have a Federally protected right to keep your propterty until it can be ordered...

If lived within 100 miles, that cop would be working at Walmart, your friend would be driving a cuiser. And I do it for free just because it is a big pile of dung, and the stench overbearing.

A marriage licsense is a "contract". If she breached that, she is considered "immoral" and comes to the court "without clean hands". She has no case, give her hell!

Was a parenting plan place in order? or just some papers filed and the judge "made" a decision? Any changes can be met with a petition for modification, and if you have the better parenting plan, you will most likely win. 50% parenting time is a Ferderally protected right. I don't care...

If you or you lawyer need some cases to back it up, I can provide it for free on this site. I post the cases here, for all to read. Chime in if you need a lil more.

The above quote may be for what they get away with. I have the most current case law saying this is completly wrong posted above. I stand on my case law which I posted ealier, and will ram it home if need be. Clearly, the poster above in quotes, has no clue to what a "Writ of Detinue" even...

Open your F'N eyes GH. Cyber Stalker. Did you even bother to read what the poster was charged with? Ya, I bet they just made the poster sign a freagin waiver, and go on their way. Be real. Pay attention, or join a feagin communist board.

No thanks needed, just do what need's to be done, never give up. You may not have time or the money or whatever on this case alone, but next time, they wont get you so easily. You don't want to plead, you wan to fight the initial stop(which the majority like the witch burning days thin you...

Did I send you that Writ? It was based on a suspended dl, all bs, like your case. They cannot take your car(unless you do nothing) without a hearing. Notice the case law posted was not rebuted with fact??? Hu. You have rights, don't put up with the government attitude, defend yourself...

Sue the pukes who did the background check. They started this entire thing by doing a half-assed job on the background check. Everyday you are out of work, they owe you. You will have to go to court to get your money.

If they took your car without a hearing to impound, they violated your right to due process. That's where I would attack first. If you don't have your car back, you should file a Writ of Detinue. I took this from a Writ, funny, but it worked:

No, it's not legal. That "cruiser" is the peoples, not joe blow cops. The people allow him to use the car for official purposes only, not to take someone out, driving at such a reckless speed. On duty, off duty, no matter. It's not a toy for his friends to play with. Someone need's to report...

You can file for a modification in custody/visitation. You have a RIGHT to equal parenting time. I'm sure the court would look at these changes and help you gain more time with your kids.

Criminal-No. Unless a complaint was signed, then it would be criminal. It is "crime" in the form of a Tort. Alone it wouldn't constitute gaining full custody, but would be very helpful. Judges get really mad when one parent says something negative around kids. Calling dad a child molester...

I don't know what the shyster is up to. The court will more than likely order some sort of "settlement meeting" anyway. If you see the lawyer in the court house before the hearing, try again. I would mention it to the judge as well. He has a duty to take an offer to the client. I guess...

Rowshere: Check your PM's. I have a file to large to post on here on sueing the police. Your "crime" is called a Malum Prohibitum Crime, and is delt with differently than a crime with a victim.

cbg is correct, it isn't Road Island. The doctrine of "At-will employment" comes from a case Payne v. Western & Atlantic R.R., 81 Tenn. 507 (1884), and was and is adopted by the majority of the states. You can override this if your company has an "employee's handbook". The Payne case...

Road Island is another.

Well, it would be under the Washington Rules of Civil Procedure. You motion to dismiss before you respond to anything else. If you have answered the complaint, the motion is moot. Anytime you motion the court for a dismisal, you always ask that it be dismissed with prejudice so they don't...