Speak with an attorney anyway.
Because only one of the crimes would possibly be a CIMT, and because it happened after the 5 year period (you did your homework - well done :) ), I am not convinced that it will actually make a lot of difference, if any.
You don't have any rights, I'm afraid.
Mom can come and get him. The only possible way you'd get a shot at custody would be if you could prove her unfit. That is actually incredibly difficult to do. It's not about best interests at this point - best interest would come into play if...
I'm not entirely in agreement with the others.
These are petty crimes, and if they happened before you obtained your residency they're even less likely to matter.
Even if they happened afterwards, there's only one that might be considered a CIMT and that's the fraud.
See an...
"Best interest" is likely what the attorney IS doing.
Mom has limited resources and an unrealistic expectation.
Assuming the marriage is less than 10 years, she wouldn't get alimony and any that she did get would be very temporary - think "6 months" rather than "6 years". But that's...
Technically yes, per Illinois law you are equally responsible for medical bills of your spouse.
But in real terms, I'm not honestly sure it matters that much - they cannot garnish your social security, and your pension is safe.
You can read here...
Typically a break room would have only a limited expectation of privacy. However, there is a problem with recording audio - Pennsylvania is an "all party consent" state which requires the consent of all involved.
That aside, I get the feeling that your co-worker doesn't really understand...
Oh they might be able to do that, yes. But that won't prove that she wasn't involved, or that she didn't initiate the entire alleged fraud herself.
Note that I have no dog in this fight - but if I was a prosecutor, the fact that the check was not signed by her wouldn't prove much of...
Perhaps she's telling you what she thinks you want to hear. Obviously someone higher up isn't believing her.
There will be no OOJ or criminal conspiracy prosecution here.
And once again, signature analysis won't do what you think it will do.
I'm not convinced that would be enough to clear her name at all.
Evidently the State's Attorney doesn't believe her; has she tried to contact the other people?
Okay. This is what I recommend.
Go here. http://www.rosettastone.com/anti-piracy
Call the number, write down your questions, and get the contact information of who you're speaking with.
Then, Google "rosetta stone scam" - it will bring up some Youtube videos which are quite detailed...
OP, do not ignore this issue just yet.
Verify who has is sending you these demands - because while there are indeed scammers, Rosetta is notorious for "pulling" stuff like this ... and doing so legally.
She has the right to quiet enjoyment. If your dogs are barking, or your music is too loud, she's doing nothing wrong in reporting you - specially if she feels she cannot safely approach you about the subject.
Keep your music volume to an acceptable level.
Technically yes - you can sue him in small claims court.
The difficulty though is that you may need to sue him in NY, and collecting a judgment can be costly and time-consuming.
If the fur was sold as "used" though, rather than new, you've got an even bigger problem.
The police will not get involved, but if they do? They'll be helping YOU to get her on the plane.
You don't have to show anybody a darned thing. You are the SOLE parent here and your rights will not be trumped by a teenager who won't follow your rules, or a stepfather who - well, I'm...
OP - it might not seem like it to you, but overnights are CRITICAL. In the states where time-sharing directly impacts child support, it's the overnights which count.