Search results

I would expect any resident may do so. These were not guests of any resident who had any right to be there.

It seems the roads in that housing area are private, owned by the residents, and there is appropriate signage outside at the entrances. I would disagree that even a peaceful mob has any right to enter or remain on the property, and in fact they had a duty to leave when told and became...

Most likely because of the way they forced their way onto the property. If I remember correctly they broke the gate down. That is not an indicator of peaceful intention.

Yes it does. It refers to 563.031. The defendant must raise the issue of defense and the prosecution must prove the action was unreasonable under the circumstances.

That may unfortunately be true in some areas, but is certainly not true when speaking of the country as a whole.

That song is the ringtone on my phone :)

It is all for show at this point. I don't know why any prosecutor would put the time and effort in to it when the governor already promised a pardon. Let this one go.

He can keep himself safe if he just stays in his basement. Meanwhile, life goes on.

You have no obligation to ever go back there for any reason. It does not matter if their papers are signed. Either way you have lost your job and are unlikely to get unemployment. The only reason you might want to go back is to collect your final paycheck, but they will likely mail it to you...

Have you brought this issue to the dealer?

You may have another issue regarding your application. The wording of the question can change your answer. You may well have an arrest record with the police showing a DUI, but you were uktimately not charged or convicted for DUI. It appears you escaped with an infraction that was then...

It appears you were not charged with DUI but for speeding. Perhaps your lawyer arranged for the DUI to be dropped in exchange for a guilty plea on the speeding offense, which can be charged as a misdemeanor. On the completion of traffic school your speeding offense was apparently dismissed...

There may very well be a mistake of fact that needs to be resolved. I was only staying the obvious- if a warrant was issued then, yes, one may be taken into custody one the command of that warrant. You eventually received counsel from the court appointed attorney. Did you not get an answer about...

A warrant commands law enforcement to take the named person into custody, so yes, if one is issued incarceration should be expected.

Very slowly these issues are making their way through. Surely there will be more to come. Michigan court strikes down governor's emergency Covid powers - CNNPolitics

Based only on what you have provided there does not seem to be any negligence. I don't see that you have anything to take over. Was there any contract? Was the dog supposed to be caged or leashed? Were special arrangements made that were not followed?

Your solution at this point is in small claims court. Do you have any emails, text messages, voicemails that support your claim you are owed money? If so, you could already have a valid contract the court can enforce.

The warrant was most likely issued because he had not checked in as required, despite his effort. If his PO was involved and gave him instructions that can mitigate this then that will come out later. He will just have to work through the process. His status as a parolee may make things seem...

No. Per #4 you are settling your differences as of the date of the agreement. It does not address future disputes. For that you would start all over. You might ask for an addition indicating that nothing in this agreement limits any future action by either party for future incidents.

Bad idea. Even the bb gun. If you injure the neighbor dog the roles will be reversed. Shooting anything at the dog opens you to civil liability and possible charges for animal cruelty. If the dog is loose call animal control.