Recent content by wwsteel7

youre trollin :)

Thanks for your input. :) That Robin thing was funny, I'm not a troll. Might be living under a bridge soon tho. :)

Youre right, no reference to those names at any point

Maybe its important the lineal order in which the reference is made. Perhaps scene 1 shows bad guy being handed bat, scene 2 shows bad guy beating someone in office with bat, scene 3 shows good guy at home with friends, talking about the stories they heard of the bad guy using a bat to settle...

What if someone made an animated 3D movie, whose 2 main characters are sometimes referred to as the batman (due to beating people with a baseball bat- never any logo/insignia to represent the wings of a bat), and the joker, (practical joker always laughing at own jokes). No makeup. They both...

or, what if the stripe was reversed in direction and colors were different? Not looking like A-team much at all

ok, thanks

oh, I thought it was a 1979 Chevy. I dont want yet to invent my own paint job, I want to be able to legally infer the connection of A-team and character

Its about the spiritual journey of the main character. But he gets in car accident along the way, gets minivan fixed and painted. The spiritual journey, it must be said in movie, is about going from point A to point b, then back to point A again. At no time in the movie though is it expressed...

If I were to make a movie that included a contemporary minivan vehicle (different than the original 1979 GMC model) with a paint job eerily similar to that of the original paint job or A-team movie (black or silver on top of red racing stripe on top of black), is that some type of infringement...