Recent content by nooracle

Thank you very much for your answer. But how are things done in Australia?

Less than 1 month before hearing, two of the plaintiffs, where I am the third one, decided to abandon the case. The other party says I can't keep the evidence related to them, even though it was provided by the adverse party itself. This evidence is of key importance, its absence damages my...

The only remaining plaintiff in this case is me. The Affidavit of documents, delivered by Defendants, included documents relating to two other plaintiffs who decided to abandon the case. Now the Defendants are going to move to prevent me from using this evidence. The withdrawal of this evidence...

In 2007 during discovery (at Ontario Superior Court of Justice) I undertook to provide income information for 2000-2006, that is "details of income and Income Tax statements". Now, referring to the undertaking, the adverse party demand me to provide the same information (calling it "sources of...

Before adoption of a new Code an applicant applied to the Commission which, after investigation, referred the case to the Tribunal, as it was in our case. By new rules the applications carried and transferred by the Commission to the Tribunal before June 31, 2008 (when a new Code was enacted)...

Thank you very much. I communicated to the adverse party on my insisting to have the evidence preserved: they told me they are going to put the question before a pre-trial judge. But I am not sure that the pre-trial judge is the right person. In my opinion, it should be the trial judge. Could it...

Thank you. I cannot make a motion after setting the matter down to trial; if formally I accept admissibility only of my personal evidence (the adverse party formula saying:"the Order [to dismiss the case by other parties] does not adversely affect the action of the Plaintiff"), how good chances...

We are three parties. The case was set down for trial. Two parties abandoned the case. The adverse party says I have no right to use evidence brought in by abandoning parties - it says if I do not accept the inadmissibility of the evidence they will bring in the motion with costs against me...