Hi. I tried to answer yesterday, but I ran up against a "5 posts in 24 hours" limit.
Again, the present day is not my concern. I'm concerned with events in the past.
And my questions, again, at this point are hypothetical. I might forget about this tomorrow. I might spend a year and write a...
It does include Phoenix, I guess. The practice is widespread. But I, personally, am not interested so much in Phoenix, even though I live here. I mean, I am interested in where I live, and want the world to be a better place, but I'm more concerned with events of decades ago.
Called DOL...
You may be right, but you're not explaining it in a way I understand.
Why is it not labor? If you look at entertainment law, anything kids do in the context of a money-making enterprise is labor. Playing baseball for the camera? That's work, if you're asked to do it, for an episode of a TV show...
Why? The elements are the same as YouTube and other child labor cases. No difference. Kid is pinched to squawk in public places. What, in terms of the elements, makes what bait kids do not work?
The key element is that the parents are career informants. They are making money, and advancing their career. They are making money, in large part, off the bait kid.
Imagine a circus performer. She does the trapeze, and has a daughter. On weekend, she tells daughter, "Mow the lawn!" Or maybe...
Here is the question stated another way, hopefully easier to understand:
"There seems no possibility whatsoever, under any reasonable, objective thought process known to humankind, that children used as bait kids can be seen as anything other than child laborers who suffer demonstrable harm...
Hi,
First post. Joined to ask this question.
This is a theoretical, provoked by kids used by parents to make money on YouTube.
If a kid is put on the street by parents who are career confidential informants as bait for offenders, long-term, without pay, with possible other aggravating factors...