wronglyaccused
New Member
I am quite convinced that I have been wrongly accused of speeding on the San Francisco Bay Bridge. I was given a ticket that states my speed at 70 to 73 mph. I and my passenger both think my speed was about 55 mph. I never looked at my speedometer as it never occurred to me that I was being pulled over for speeding. I am quite sure that I wasn't going anywhere close to 70 to 73 mph.
When I first noticed police lights in my rear view mirror they were several hundred yards behind me and behind another car. I couldn't tell if it was a police car or ambulance. A few minutes later I notice the police car much closer to me and closing on me fast. He must have been going around 75 mph. It appeared to me that he might have been pulling someone else over and then changed his mind and decided to go after me perhaps because I was driving a red sports car (Honda Civic).
Why would I be wrongly accused? The posted speed limit was 50 mph and I estimate that every last person on the bridge was going about 55 mph like me. So we were all technically speeding. Secondly in September 2009 the "S curve" section of the bridge that I was heading for was re-routed and since that time there have been over 42 accidents in the S curve including a fatality. The safety issues of the new S curve have been major news items and Caltrans and the CHP have been under lots of pressure to slow traffic down before it enters the S curve. There is no break down lane on the bay bridge so the only way to pull someone over is to get them to exit at the Yerba Buena Island exit. In my case I can only imagine that this officer was driving in a loop between Oakland and Yerba Buena Island and his goal is to write one ticket every time through the loop. In my case Yerba Buena Island exit was fast approaching and I was his most convenient victim.
I intend to go to court to fight the ticket. I am also considering filing a complaint against this officer. However, I am worried because the CHP web sites warns that if the complaint is found to be baseless that the CHP officer has the right to bring a civic action against the person filing the complaint. The case comes down to my word against his which I have to assume will go against me. My reason for filing the complaint is so that it doesn't happen to the next person. So my question is what do I have to fear from a civic action?
Thanks
When I first noticed police lights in my rear view mirror they were several hundred yards behind me and behind another car. I couldn't tell if it was a police car or ambulance. A few minutes later I notice the police car much closer to me and closing on me fast. He must have been going around 75 mph. It appeared to me that he might have been pulling someone else over and then changed his mind and decided to go after me perhaps because I was driving a red sports car (Honda Civic).
Why would I be wrongly accused? The posted speed limit was 50 mph and I estimate that every last person on the bridge was going about 55 mph like me. So we were all technically speeding. Secondly in September 2009 the "S curve" section of the bridge that I was heading for was re-routed and since that time there have been over 42 accidents in the S curve including a fatality. The safety issues of the new S curve have been major news items and Caltrans and the CHP have been under lots of pressure to slow traffic down before it enters the S curve. There is no break down lane on the bay bridge so the only way to pull someone over is to get them to exit at the Yerba Buena Island exit. In my case I can only imagine that this officer was driving in a loop between Oakland and Yerba Buena Island and his goal is to write one ticket every time through the loop. In my case Yerba Buena Island exit was fast approaching and I was his most convenient victim.
I intend to go to court to fight the ticket. I am also considering filing a complaint against this officer. However, I am worried because the CHP web sites warns that if the complaint is found to be baseless that the CHP officer has the right to bring a civic action against the person filing the complaint. The case comes down to my word against his which I have to assume will go against me. My reason for filing the complaint is so that it doesn't happen to the next person. So my question is what do I have to fear from a civic action?
Thanks