Misdemeaner

I'm really not sure of the details but in most instances, unless what you were going to say might have changed the outcome of the case, it will likely not be upheld. If there was danger that you would not stay within the guidelines, perhaps the judge used his discretion properly -- I don't know. But the bottom line is that if you had no testimony to provide that would refute the charge that you committed some crime and there was sufficient evidence to find you guilty, I'm not sure if it would make a difference.

For example, if you possessed cocaine and you had no defense, there were pictures of you with the cocaine, does it make a difference that you didn't have an opening statement? The only difference you could make is through your testimony, under oath. Any explanation you might want to give in an opening would not be admissible unless it was given under oath as testimony on your behalf and subjected to cross examination. Otherwise it is a free shot, a self-serving statement which cannot be properly substantiated.

 

It all depends upon what the motion is for and the urgency with regard to the matter. There are usually court procedures for such and compliance is necessary.