I was recently informed by my immediate supervisor that, due to workforce reduction, my position at a large corporation was being eliminated and that I was being involuntarily seperated.
At the time, she was responsible for a small number of employees based in no less than 6 work sites across the State and reserved discretion in workforce assignments and distribution.
I inquired into the numbers of impacted employees and what factors were used to select separatees. She informed me she was not authorized to answer those questions, other than it was a difficult decision for her to make- indicating she had final discretion.
Unfortunately, I was escorted from the premises before I could gather documentation as to my work history, including performance results and customer satisfaction surveys.
I contend that my performance was above average, I had no disciplinary history, I was above average in regards to training, certification, years of experience, job knowledge and physical ability to perform the work as required for the job as might be otherwise grounds for dismissal.
My manager may contend a business need for the choices she made, however I contend she made the choices based on personal preference and arguably discrimination based on sex as 2 less qualified retained employees were female.
Furthermore, I was the youngest, only male employee in my immediate workplace, contributing to a hostile work environment.
Do I have grounds to complain an Equal Employment Opportunty violation of 42 U.S.C., Chapter 21, Subchapter 6 Section 2000e-2 or other statute?
Additionally, with recent reorganizations, we had worked over 2 years with no practical job descriptions, seniority, merit or measurement system. However, despite performing the same job duties, some of employees were classified exempt, some non-exempt. Would this and/or the fact that the 3 separated employees were non-exempt be violation of any law?
Thanks!
At the time, she was responsible for a small number of employees based in no less than 6 work sites across the State and reserved discretion in workforce assignments and distribution.
I inquired into the numbers of impacted employees and what factors were used to select separatees. She informed me she was not authorized to answer those questions, other than it was a difficult decision for her to make- indicating she had final discretion.
Unfortunately, I was escorted from the premises before I could gather documentation as to my work history, including performance results and customer satisfaction surveys.
I contend that my performance was above average, I had no disciplinary history, I was above average in regards to training, certification, years of experience, job knowledge and physical ability to perform the work as required for the job as might be otherwise grounds for dismissal.
My manager may contend a business need for the choices she made, however I contend she made the choices based on personal preference and arguably discrimination based on sex as 2 less qualified retained employees were female.
Furthermore, I was the youngest, only male employee in my immediate workplace, contributing to a hostile work environment.
Do I have grounds to complain an Equal Employment Opportunty violation of 42 U.S.C., Chapter 21, Subchapter 6 Section 2000e-2 or other statute?
Additionally, with recent reorganizations, we had worked over 2 years with no practical job descriptions, seniority, merit or measurement system. However, despite performing the same job duties, some of employees were classified exempt, some non-exempt. Would this and/or the fact that the 3 separated employees were non-exempt be violation of any law?
Thanks!
Last edited: