ItsWeThePeople
New Member
I was pulled over in East Texas(Nacogdoches County ) and ticketed for leaving the scene of an accident. As I told the officer, "there hasn't been any accident". This guy alleged that my trailer that I was pulling behind my excursion hit his truck. I went and took pictures of this guys truck immediately after the police let me go. The dammage that he is claiming is very lite scuff marks on his front drivers side fender well. The police report states that the dammage was lite as well. So if we did accidently make contact that would explain why I nor anyone else in my truck felt or knew that anything occured. Now Im being treated like a common criminal by the locals and they refuse to dismiss it. The Insurnace companies have investigated and have not found me at fault. There is no dammage to my truck or trailer. The court just wants the money. The city prosecutor will not drop the case. He states that my wife and I made conflicting statements on the police video camera. Well the true reason is that I made the statement that cops should not be driving around in fifty thousand dollar suburbans and tahoes on tax payer dollars. The cop would not tell my why he pulled me over and that made me angry and we had words but no cursing. He eventually told me but in East Texas the cops are Notorious about commiting crimes themselves so I was on guard. Being a Army veteran of eight years I was not going to conform and he did not like that I was standing up to him and questioning him. So of course he ticketed me and said tell it to the judge. This is abuse to say the least. He would of gotten my full cooperation if he would of answered me when I asked him the first time why he pulled me over but he chose not to. My question is this. How can the judge allow the police video to be admitted when it does not show the alleged accident. It only shows me driving several miles away from where the accident was to have occured. (That's all hearsay) My next question is how can they use what my wife said to the officer against me. She was not under oath and can not be forced to testify against me in court by law. So how can this police video be admitted as evidence? They are just trying to burn me for the comments that I made but I will stand behind them. Why must police drive around in $60k suburbans and tahoes on tax payer dollars. Government is suppose to be working for the people not living off of the backs of the tax payers. That's not justice. Preying on the citizens. What's wrong with a Crown Vic? After these suburans and tahoes are rigged out with all the bells and whistles they are probably looking at $100k each of tax payers dollars and for what? Crime keeps increasing all over. Are these loaded out veheciles going to make crime go down? Yeah right. Hard to tell who the real criminals are> Bad Cops all over giving good cops bad names. Protect and serve has changed to Protect myself and seize whatever I can. Check out Tenaha, Texas Cops and Crooked DA. Seizeing peoples belongings illegally. It's We The People Not We The Government!