- Jurisdiction
- California
I am a buyer with a purchase contract for a single family house. No contingency. With loan approved and a week from closing, I discovered an office and a garage were converted without permit. I would like to know what my options are at this time.
There are two forms the seller filled out regarding disclosures. One is called "PRDS Real Estate Transfer Disclosures". On this form, the seller answered "No" to all disclosure questions including "Are you aware of Room Additions, Structure modification, or other alternations or repairs made without necessary permit".
The 2nd from is called "PRDS Supplemental Seller's Checklist". On this form, the seller hand wrote "remodeled 8/2017" and checked No to the question "with permit?"
After much efforts from the sellers and agents trying to get me go through with the purchase (they hired an attorney threatening the loss of deposit etc), the seller is now asking if I am willing to close if they cure the permit issues. I am hesitant to take this option primarily because I don't want to wait around for the permits issue to be resolved. I would much rather moving on and buy a different property.
My questions are:
1. Am I obligated to grant the sellers time to cure the issues?
2. If I am not willing to take the option, what should be my course of action in order to the deposit back?
3. Do I have rights to ask for sellers to pay for my costs and damages?
Thank you very much in advance for any help you may provide.
There are two forms the seller filled out regarding disclosures. One is called "PRDS Real Estate Transfer Disclosures". On this form, the seller answered "No" to all disclosure questions including "Are you aware of Room Additions, Structure modification, or other alternations or repairs made without necessary permit".
The 2nd from is called "PRDS Supplemental Seller's Checklist". On this form, the seller hand wrote "remodeled 8/2017" and checked No to the question "with permit?"
After much efforts from the sellers and agents trying to get me go through with the purchase (they hired an attorney threatening the loss of deposit etc), the seller is now asking if I am willing to close if they cure the permit issues. I am hesitant to take this option primarily because I don't want to wait around for the permits issue to be resolved. I would much rather moving on and buy a different property.
My questions are:
1. Am I obligated to grant the sellers time to cure the issues?
2. If I am not willing to take the option, what should be my course of action in order to the deposit back?
3. Do I have rights to ask for sellers to pay for my costs and damages?
Thank you very much in advance for any help you may provide.