Kwinkles
New Member
- Jurisdiction
- California
i AM CURRENTLY DRAFTING MY OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. mY CAUSE OF ACTION IS PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL...SO CAN I ALLEGDE A IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT? MY CONCERN IS THAT FOR MY CASE TO NOT BE BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS I AM PLEADING PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL IN WHICH I MUST PROVE A PROMISE WAS MADE TO ME " A CLEAR PROMISE" SO DOESN'T THAT MEAN I CAN NOT ALLEDGE IMPLIED-IN -FACT CONTRACT SINCE THE VERY ELEMENT OF IMPLIED-IN-FACT IS THAT THERE WAS NO CLEAR CUT CONTRACT OF EVEN AGREEMENT BUT RATHER THE ACTIONS OF BOTH PARTIES SHOW THAT THE "INTENTION" WAS THERE? SO DOESN'T ONE CANCEL OUT THE OTHER? OR AM I OK WITH BOTH IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT AND PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL?WHICH IS OF COURSE WHAT I AM HOPING TO HEAR? ANY THOUGHTS GREATLY APPERICATED