Search results

Do you mean because it has my name, address, and some account information? Thanks

This explains what happened.

What you said totally made sense. However, I was at the court today and asked at the information window, and they said yes, absolutely, the person (even though out of state) can be subpoenaed. My only goal here is to turn up the heat on them. I don't think they will show. Someone else I spoke to...

I found it. It is actually the same one I once found online. It was in the original folder Santander gave me when I opened the account.

I was advised by someone who knows about the law that I should subpoena one of the bankers who discussed my situation with me on the telephone. Is this possible in a Small Claims case? The person is not even residing in NY. How would this work?

Can you explain how this communication should/will go. It seems like since the time when they got served they stopped talking. Thanks for any help

Thanks adjusterjack, great information. I have been saying I could be thinking of stuff that does not matter. I take it that the other (ignored) fraud attempts on my account around the same time mean nothing to as them being responsible also, correct?

Also I have a couple of phone recordings stating I am not responsible for the transactions, and other things. Can/Should I share this with the legal team before the case.

Hi, thanks for the reply. That is good information to know. This is a transaction via my checking accounts debit Mastercard. Is that not covered via Mastercard 0 liability for fraud? I am trying to find a specific agreement for that and cannot. Is there anyway to ask Mastercard to step in here?

I have a case I have filled against a bank in Small Claims Court of NYC. This case relates to fraud committed on my debit MasterCard. After I field the case with the city of New York and not related to them being aware I did that. The bank called me for quality assurance. When I explained to...