Search results

HRguy, the best. This was what I was looking for. Perhaps coupled with actual court cases regarding this matter that help my side. Now you guys know next time someone comes asking, rather than calling them crazy. Right to privacy - Wikipedia "On 10 December 1948, the United Nations General...

HRguy. Actually, best answer. Thank you.

I see I'll receive no help here. Been fun. You guys are good practice for the crap I have to deal with though when I go visit law enforcement again. Thank you. So much.

Tax Guy Yet they have the dollars to go investigate people that'll lie rather than the technology? They were trying to. Lol. Just lol. I never said such things. You guys are the ones making stuff up. Again, dealing with this nonsense.

This board seems to intent on casting allegations on the plaintiff because of issues of disbelief, rather than offering legal advice. Again, no legal tactics I can use to hold any branch of enforcement to their jobs? I sure I can search it down on the web, but this easier resource is so much...

Also, your first questions have already been answered zddoodah.

I can explain it. Tax guy. :cool:

zddoodah ↑ "I've made multiple attempts to report this to the FBI and each time was turned away with either disinterest or responses of, "We are unaware of any such technologies." Why do you think this is? Do you think maybe it's because the FBI has received these sorts of reports before and...

AdjustableJack. 1. Radio frequencies are intangible. Look it up, not a delusion. 2. I don't remember verbatim, and that serves no purpose in solving this. Hence why I said the technology and my questions that pertain to getting law enforcement to look into the tech were the end-all. 3. What I...

I shouldn't have to do all the forensics to prove it. I figure that's what they collect taxes from me to do. I should report and they do it, I'm thinking.

Addressing the tech is the end-all to whether I'm right or not, the way to catch and prevent etc. But my claims haven't been taken seriously thus far which, again, takes us back to my orignal question. Any advice on how to get enforcement to legally have to help, or that proof that they don't...

Also, AdjusterJack. Snowden?

Back to my original question. Which I'm still waiting on a response to if you guys actually have one. HRguy said the supreme court said something about no obligations, I'm just wondering how that fits next to the Simon Biles case. Too much focus on the legitimacy and not legal advice. Strange.

Again, evidence, if acquired, is intangible. And again any ideas on how to accomplish detecting, individualizing, tracing frequencies in the air? That'd be helpful, unlike all this so far. The means by which I know is various people following me and expressing that know intimate details about...

Also HR guy "My fellow survivors and I were betrayed by every institution that was supposed to protect us - the US Olympic Committee, USA Gymnastics, the FBI and now the Department of Justice," Olympic gold medalist McKayla Maroney said in a statement. "It is clear that the only path to...

Army Judge, none of that answered my question, but it answered PayrollHRguys question in regard to what makes me think law enforcement should take things seriously. HRguy can you link where that's stated, Law enforcement having no obligations to protect, supreme courts ruling? The evidence is...

So, no legal tips, huh? How about just accountability of law enforcement to take matters seriously? I could pull them to court and then let the judge decide things. Any laws or legal advice for that? Seems like regardless of if I'm crazy or not, that'll work itself out in court.

Are you guys legit lawyers, officials? If so point me to a psych and I'll pass and then be back with the same problem.

UNITED STATES v. JONES | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu) - Tracking case. Legality and Reasons of Landlords Put Security Cameras in Rental Property - Reolink Blog - Human tendency to want to record illegally. What's so crazy? With technology where it is...

And if I did. Then would you take my claims serious? Why is it so hard to believe?