Search results

As phrased, it's a physical impossibility (unless his house is also underground). Assuming you meant "on his property," instead of "on his house," there certainly won't be a law against it. Whether it violates any agreement between the four of you is, of course, impossible for anyone here to...

What do the relevant written contracts (between you and the broker and between you and the contractors who did the work) say about this? Do those written contracts make it the broker's responsibility to deal with this issue? Also, who told you that there is a problem? $8,000 is small claims...

Ok...so? I assume that, in response, you explained the circumstances, including the "mistaken identify" situation, and told the PD that you weren't interested in taking a plea bargain and that you want to take the case to trial. I'll just leave it at that because you shouldn't be disclosing...

The rule wouldn't exist without a reason. You can consult with a local attorney (or just call the county sheriff) to see if there are any work-arounds.

You should consult with the incarcerated person's attorney. No one here can speak intelligently about what it will take to get some unknown person out of jail.

I'm just going to say this as a general comment: Maybe there are factors that justified it, but this is, on its face, a ridiculous way to set up a trust. Even though you're living in an assisted-living facility? Are you looking for some sort of step-by-step "how to" guide? You'll need to...

It's really this simple: name calling is not a legal matter.

The statute of limitations for a civil fraud lawsuit in Washington is three years. One of the elements of a fraud claim is reasonable reliance by the plaintiff on the defendant's alleged fraudulent representation. That you had a professional inspection done means you cannot have reasonably...

Is this a tenant whose tenancy has been terminated? If so, any competent landlord should know that the security deposit may be applied to repair damages in excess of normal wear and tear and unpaid rent. Since you didn't tell us how much it cost to repair the damage and how much of a deposit...

I would find his ability to explain all that coherently more probative than anything else - considering that folks are able to ride unicycles on tightropes.

The most you can sue for in small claims court is $10k. If you intend to sue for more than that, you're probably looking at a minimum of $200/hr. for an attorney.

I don't understand what you're asking. If you're talking about some sort of form by which the people submitting videos give you a license to do whatever you want to do with them, you'll need to consult with a local attorney. Beyond providing general information about the law, anonymous...

Liability insurance wouldn't have a deductible. Commercial liability insurance often has self-insured retention, which requires the insured to cover up to a certain amount of liability and/or defense costs, but I've never heard of homeowner's insurance having an SIR.

The property owner is liable if he/she committed negligence. In this case, the negligence would be allowing an unreasonably hazardous condition to exist. Based solely on your post, I see no negligence. However, I agree with this:

1. What was the address where you made the delivery (I ask so that we can look it up on Google maps, but I understand that you might not want to provide that information)? 2. How many lanes of traffic were there? Or, more generally, describe how the street was laid out (e.g., "when I double...

I'll bet a dollar that any reasonably competent defense attorney would see this set of facts and try to negotiate a plea bargain pursuant to which the OP pleads guilty to the misdemeanor theft charge (theft in the third degree under RCW 9A.56.050), with the felony burglary charge being dropped.

Recourse for what? No. $0.00 is standard. No one here has any information about your employer's willingness to negotiate the severance. No one here has read the "employment letter" to which you referred or has any information beyond that which you included in your post. Therefore, no one...

Absent other facts relating to the status of the protective order, I think option B in the prior response is the objectively "best course of action."

I assume this means that you were asked never to return to the store. Per RCW 9A.52.030(1), "[a] person is guilty of burglary in the second degree if, with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, he or she enters or remains unlawfully in a building other than a vehicle or...