Search results

So to summarize.... (And let's not forget that I live in the same state as the OP.) Luckily for Dad, he does not have to register with the putative father registry in order to protect his claim to paternity (that's because it doesn't exist in WA). This means that HE WILL NEED TO BE...

And often it can lead to worsening of the situation. Heck, in some communities it's actually spelled out very clearly that such things DO go first to the landlord. He's a neutral third party. Of course, if we are firing a shotgun into a barrel of fish... That aside, this appears to be...

If this is a one-off, the chances are superb that he'll get nothing but a minor slap on the wrist. If he has a habit of hiding, hoarding or otherwise keeping your mutual child's meds, that's another thing entirely.

They cannot restrict you - but they can indeed restrict Dad (which amounts to the same thing). I disagree that this is common. It's common when the parents are married and divorcing, yes, but not when they were never wed to begin with.

How well controlled are the diabetes and depression?

Why do you need this information? Are you willing to provide your ex the same information? Yes, I'm asking for a reason.

The porn, likely not. Poor parenting is just that...and today, some may view it as nothing worse than looking at Dad's Playboy collection 30 years ago. The X-box will be viewed the same way. If the reunification plan is between your son and your grandson, your son is really the person...

I'm not sure I've ever disagreed so strongly here. If Mom has stopped using she has every right to be wary and if Dad is foolish enough to walk into court and say "But she was also using before we separated", he may just find that he's given supervised visitation with random UIs before he can...

I do NOT recommend confronting the person directly. Think about it.

Going to need a bit more than that, sorry. What happened?

Take your divorce decree and the rest of it down to the SS office and file the (free) paperwork there to get that started, then when you do that take your new SS card down with all the rest of it to the DMV and get your new ID. This shouldn't be complicated at all. :)

Well..you kind of would be...because the court won't help you collect, and you can't have the seller's wages garnished. But the bigger problem is really that you bought it on Craigs' List. You're buying it "as is".

Probably worth double checking for Louisiana. It being...Louisiana, and all.

By definition, landlords require a lease. The only difference is whether there is a formal written document, or a verbal or "understood" agreement. They both amount to the same thing - a lease. Is that what you actually meant?

Tell her the truth. It still doesn't mean you can't be banned from the property.

You can try. Expect to be ignored. You can try again. Expect to receive 20-odd pieces of paper with virtually anything of any interest redacted. And that's assuming the State can actually respond. I suspect her attorney already knows this. So, onto the meat of the argument: What...

When did this happen, and what do you believe has changed since then?

That's nice. Did you have a question?

You need to talk with your case worker - they will want to make sure the children remain in the current jurisdiction, and you may end up with a decision to make.

That is quite enough. You spent hours on an incredibly rude rant in the other forum; you're not doing that here.