Search results

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), a “conviction” for immigration purposes includes: [A] formal judgment of guilt of the alien entered by a court or, if adjudication of guilt has been withheld, where: (i) a judge or jury has found the alien guilty or the alien has entered a plea...

First,I am not a Lawyer,so get an IMMIGRATION ATTORNEY pronto!! IMMIGRATION ATTORNEY because,I have read that dispositions that are not convictions under state laws—such as a deferred adjudication program that results in the dismissal of all charges,such is,I believe your case,—may be...

...........

"Everything is determined, the beginning as well as the end, by forces over which we have no control. It is determined for the insect as well as the star. Human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune, intoned in the distance by an invisible piper." - Albert...

I meant what is the reason that they,the youth,you refer to,are thinking the way you allege they think.What is the cause,for such consequence,is what I meant,and asked. The "truth" and 'logic" must be real,if you want to make argument or assertion.You made assertion,that "youth today are mainly...

he he he ...the truth? and,why they are like that?

I read someone wrote that In Fairbanks, Alaska, it's illegal to serve liquor to a moose. By contrast, in Ohio it's legal to serve booze to a fish, but not if you get it drunk. :)

Greetings wise judge :) I didn't know that the premise is taught.But even if it was,it is very short lesson. I was wondering why not teach a deeper understanding of the nature of law, of legal reasoning, legal systems and of legal institutions....things such as principles of the natural law...

Ignorantia juris non excusat is the principle in jurisprudence that one is bound by a law even if one does not know of it. That is in effect prohibition to be ignorant of the law.:no: We are all presumed to have knowledge of the law.:yes: The doctrine assumes that the laws have been...

in Ohio.... http://voices.washingtonpost.com/political-economy/2010/10/ohio_sues_ally_financial_for_f.html?hpid=news-col-blog

.....................

never mind...

That is what happens when I try to get raise....forced resignation....:( The consolation is,it is easy to get employed back in virtual reality ... :) cheers,greetings from OH

how do you plead defendant John39? guilty,I shouldn't have tried to have a debate with deputy sheriff mightymoose :) You win mightymoose the title goes back to the scholar and the challenger retreats in the back,defeated the end :)

:) Yes,a fortiori And what did they have with the use of phone while driving?Why would this be a problem? I don't need to look at and bring angles.

tpajet hi On what thing,if anything, the officer is basing his citation,or is "allowed" to issue a citation is irrelevant. It is irrelevant because,being "allowed" to issue citation,is not the same to being allowed to automatically win your case,just because you wrote citation.He was...

The burden of proof rests on who asserts, not on who denies. Presumption of innocence comes from this legal maxim Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat You want to study law?Study the Roman Law first.The development of Roman law comprises more than a thousand years of jurisprudence...

Maybe sufficient for you.Maybe even for all of you here on the forum,and maybe even for the vast majority out there. Not for me.I don't state logical fallacies as arguments.Appeals to popularity are not arguments.I try to offer reasoning as arguments. The driver is presumed innocent, the...

I said,traffic offense can be criminal offense. Even if it is not,it is irrelevant is it or not,for the issue at question.Police officers word alone is not enough,by any standard. It might not be simple for OD one mans word be regarded more than his. Maybe that makes him feel like second class...

Hi Mightymoose + There are only two standards of proof we need to deal with: 1. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt 2. Preponderance of the Evidence Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: This standard of proof is the higher of the two. This is the standard of proof in a criminal trial. This means that the case...