Search results

:D That is funny story about Bobby and John Judge but I don't get the point. Common tell me..:)

No one wants to chat? Sublato fundamento, cadit opus

I just want to talk.This time a debate. Meliorem conditionem suam facere potest minor deteriorem nequaquam - A minor can make his position better, never worse The presumption of incompetence of minors is legal presumption. It is also rebuttable legal presumption (praesumptio iuris tantum)...

Here is couple of links I found http://www.wmur.com/r/23490201/detail.html http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/143887/ Restraining order laws in those two states (NH and NC) are almost identical to Maine Hope it helps Go get them :D

Hi I am not a lawyer,so take what I say with reserve.I suspect members here who are legal professional will assist you too,and I would advice you ,in advance ,to always take the opinion of a legal professional over mine. No,it is not true.The School has to respect the restraining order. I...

Dear Mr.Michael Wechsler Your moderator irish223 moderated this thread here: http://www.thelaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44575 The moderator did that by removing/deleting some posts from poster KCGirl and Vfielder,where KCGirl introduced certain video and Vfielder started...

Thank You mightymoose.I did.As I said before,I would be foolish to comment on Case Law decisions. I could,I can,but I don't want to do that.Apropos,I am not a lawyer,I said that many times. In my old country in Europe we had Codified Law,based upon Roman Law (based upon,not copied) ...

You attempt to combat me in another manner? You made everything clear,you don't want to debate,it is not worth the effort,it is as you say beating dead horse. But,coming here again to tell me I sound jealous is worthy of your effort?:D

Assuredly there is great merit and wisdom in this words of yours,mighty moderator.But I assure you,you can scarcely preserve that which you have so honorably acquired,that made you moderator,if you win debates this way

1.How did the juvenile driver give consent to the search by giving the phone "willingly" when officer asked for it,when legal incompetent can not give consent,either expressed,or implied. In order to give implied consent,the legal presumptions are: a)One knows and understands his/her...

Wrong again,I never brought the custody issue into play.Go through the posts. Irish223 did.And to that I responded to her, in post number 21 . All that IS regulated must not conflict with the Constitution. Nothing is unregulated. If not by lex specialis,then by lex generalis...

Wrong,nobody claimed that we are talking about situation when the juvenile is in custody. WE are talking about situation when juvenile is NOT in custody. Police represents goverment. Goverment communicates ONLY with legal competents. When goverment wants to communicate with legal...

:D Ah,the Judge said the same thing one minute before me. I wanted to collect the witt....

Mightymoose hi Minors are legal incompetents. They can not give implied ,or expressed consent in this instance,even if they WANTED to.Thys,if they did,it is invalid,because ONLY the guardian can give such consent,wheather implied or expressed. In what capacity a police officer interacts...

Thanks Judge My mother has been upset for many years that I did not become lawyer like my dad.She always thought I had the talent for it.:D

Hello Irish223 A law governing a specific subject matter overrides a law that only governs general matters,OK? IF there is no a law covering police questioning minor,when not in custody,then there is no lex specialis that would govern this,ok? But that does not mean what you imply it...

"We conclude that, although a reasonable fifteen-year-old in this situation could have felt his freedom of movement was restricted, he would not have felt that his freedom of movement was restrained to the degree associated with a formal arrest." Ok then. Your argument is the link of this...

Why not debate are you afraid ?:D Here is other opinions you say and give links? Ok,where is your opinion and can you articulate the propositions and conclusions you make in such opinion? About your links: 1The first link,there is someone I think he is a lawyer,(so what :D,I challenge his...

Irish223 Why do you say " That's simply not true. The police ARE allowed..." Please explain.Are they "allowed" that simply because there is no (I don't know is there or not,I presume there isn't) statute that forbids such action? Or,they are allowed because there is statute that "permits"...

I am not a lawyer So I don't seek statute. But should I bother? Major continet in se minus (The greater contains the less) If they can't use the statements of a minor they questioned without parental consent,why did they question the minor? Quod vanum et inutile est, lex non requirit (The...