loss of property (1 against the state of Vienna)

The Bank Austria AG. provided a credit loan requested by the office of the Vienna State Govt for the renovation of my property
while I was away in the field.
The tenants of the property (4 rented flats) are responsible for the repayment of the credit loan for a period of 10years.
The renovation project was executed by an arm of the Vienna State Govt.
The contracting parties(The Bank and Vienna) took some unorthodox actions under false pretences to procure my personal
consent. They made false statements. I never knew. It was so made that by consenting to it I was going to suffer. I acted upon their advice and am suffering likely loss of my property to them!
Needed is anyones´ opinion and any OFFICE interested in this case may write in for more details. The thought now is Brussels.
I must add before I end that the whole thing smells racism.
I worked with the UNO(Vienna) and am African.

One thing -- if you are seeking assistance via a contingency relationship with an attorney you should make sure that you organize as much documentation as possible. That will help make a contingency case more attactive.

I am not a Lawyer, I only happen to be someone in the "middle-
point" of friends and collegues.
I will gladly secure all relavant information necessary from subject
concerned.
The offer still stands.

My statement was merely reflective of what you were proposing to attorneys at large. Documentation is important for anyone seeking to have an attorney accept a contingency arrangement.

This is how it all went:
A letter of guarantee issued by "Vienna" stating nature of renovation and ammount to be approved was sent direct to the Bank by-passing me the owner of the property. A clause in the guarantee asked for a Trust Fund to be openned for the purpose.
Another clause required my signature on the quarantee or else all will be null and void.
Primarily, I did not even know this letter of guarantee existed until the account openned for the renovation (which I neither knew about ) was overdrawn by the users "Vienna".
Problem started
When I was informed of the overdraft and was told I was to be responsible. I objected and they took me to court.
It was there I obtained a copy of the guaratee letter.
I discovered for the first time the existance of an account for the project, the need for my signature being property owner.
I was meanwhile paying back the credit.
In SUMMARY:
An account was openned without my consent/approval.
My signature was done without in all transactions.
Approved ammount overdrawn.
I was paying back the approved credit.
"Vienna" asked me to approve another loan. I refused.
They wanted obviously to cover their overdraft.
The Bank then said there is an overdraft and I have to take it up.
Onset of delima.

This might be cloudy, but ask to be explained.