Returning Oregon to a Constitutional Republican form of government.

Status
Not open for further replies.

ron vrooman

New Member
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Hello, we have convened a Grand Jury on Oregon. Pursuant to OUR published intent to bring True Bills to a "1st Amendment Article III one supreme Court claiming Original jurisdiction. Found within the VII Amendment common law court of record.

Come together and meet in assembly. Listen to the evidence brought forth and vote in recorded court. All choreographed in public by name as a member of this spontaneously composed Grand Jury on Oregon... Read a Petition into the record. Request a trial by Article III found in Amendment VII.

We currently have the removal of Kate Brown, Suzanne Bonamici, Jeff Markley and Ron Wyden in default. On several counts. One alleged response from Suzanne. We have evidence that the Senate of the STATE OF OREGON in Salem is in default and operating the Senate as a Fiefdom of Alleged Senators in default. They have no proof of their legitimacy.

We currently have Bev of SoS is in default, misprision of felony, as is Ellen of the AG.

36 Sheriff's and their Association are in default on Article VII amended and selling concealed carry permits. Oath breakers without honor. They have refused to self correct. Specifically and individually Pat Garrett and several others. All are, in default, oath breakers.


The United States Attorney Billy Williams is drawing a paycheck from the DOJ and he refuses to identify himself. Misprision of felony. The same goes for the US Marshal Berger no bonafides and the FBI Special Agent in charge, all with the same issue.


The Oregon State Police Superintendent Travis Hampton. Appointed by Kate not in compliance as attested to by Richard Koenig and ron vrooman.


The Major known as Rocky of the Provost Marshal of the Oregon National Guard refuses to comply and his boss the General was appointed by kate brown. He did state that the National Guard was still Oregon not nationalized. Hence, subject to Article I Section 1.

Bev our Sec of State for the STATE OF OREGON is operating a defunct corporation, a subdivision of the United States not of the state of Oregon Article I Section 1. Unable to provide their bonafides in the Legislature, Governor, Attorney General Ellen.

Bev could decide to self correct, she is a Republican, former legislator, not an attorney so no foreign oaths. Allegedly.

Ellen and the STATE OF OREGON AG/DOJ for simulating a legal action, denial of a swift and fair trial by decree over-riding the Legislature. Enforcing Article VII amended. Evidence of every Judge, Magistrate of whatever court on Oregon and specifically Washington County and/or County of Washington and its cities such as Beaverton. The Chartered entity from the Legislation of Oregon the state a sovereign entity. Not to be confused with the defunct City of Beaverton and its subdivisions.

There is only color of law on Oregon. Simulating legal/lawful but under military law. We will be the first law since 1910.

To overcome the Lieber Code with Ex Parte Milligan and remove Marshal law!! Is to have opened a lawful civilian court. We must do it ourselves. It's all written down. They have a saying for that with our government. We have just opened that court. The Lieber Code is a nullity.


I suggest :: We notify the Republick, the US OMS of whatever, the Doj, FBI, US Marshal and WTF, BLM and Oregon National Guard Provost Marshal and USMC. Signal our intent. Establish lawful contact. Am I ; I am, I am still a point of contact for/with/of the Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly meeting as our Grand Jury. ! ?
 

Attachments

  • Notice and demand Prep for Grand Jury12272019.pdf
    269.5 KB · Views: 2
  • Prospective Juror for Grand and Petite Jury12272019.pdf
    88.2 KB · Views: 0
  • To DOJ,FBI,USMS,USMC,GSA,VA 1-19-202001292020.pdf
    476.7 KB · Views: 1
Is that the best you got Zigner. Are you familiar with a civilian court and that law form? There hasn't been a common law case brought since 1952 Florida.
So, show all your expertise. Do you have you FARA card and BAR card. I'm learning to remove you folks from the realm of the body, mind, spirit.
 
Is that the best you got Zigner. Are you familiar with a civilian court and that law form? There hasn't been a common law case brought since 1952 Florida.
So, show all your expertise. Do you have you FARA card and BAR card. I'm learning to remove you folks from the realm of the body, mind, spirit.

Ron - I have to tell you that I really really appreciate your post(s). The end of the work-day is drawing near and it hasn't been the easiest day. Your post(s) create in my body, mind, and spirit, quite a light mood.
 
Ron - I have to tell you that I really really appreciate your post(s). The end of the work-day is drawing near and it hasn't been the easiest day. Your post(s) create in my body, mind, and spirit, quite a light mood.
I'm glad I was a positive influence. I hope these docs further you good mood.
 

Attachments

  • 4 docs Take Heed for our common law court of record06092020.pdf
    586.1 KB · Views: 1
  • Petition to Kate Brown05132020.pdf
    138.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Petition to wyden, merkley, bonamici05212020.pdf
    533.2 KB · Views: 0
There doesn't appear to be a question in your post -- or, really, any sort of coherent point.
 
There doesn't appear to be a question in your post -- or, really, any sort of coherent point.
Ok. A judge told me gibberish. When I spoke of color of law on Oregon. Since Article VII amended was placed into our Constitution without one voted counted in any county Nov 8 1910. I looked it up.
Point by point:
1. executive order 100/Lieber code never nullified except where there was a civilian court. So said Ex parte milligan when implemented. Current Presidents renew martial law every two years.

Is that a coherent point?
 
Is that a coherent point?

Not particularly.

When I spoke of color of law on Oregon.

This is an incomplete sentence.

Since Article VII amended was placed into our Constitution without one voted counted in any county Nov 8 1910.

This is also an incomplete sentence (and, even if I put the two incomplete sentences together, they don't make a complete sentence or anything particular coherent). Also, I assume you're talking about Article VII of the Oregon Constitution. Correct? What does "without one voted counted in any county Nov 8 1910" mean?

executive order 100/Lieber code never nullified except where there was a civilian court.

Huh? As far as I can tell, this is a reference to an instruction that Abraham Lincoln gave to Union soldiers during the Civil War. While that order was influential to 2015 Department of Defense manual on the Law of War, it otherwise has no legal relevance today.

So said Ex parte milligan when implemented.

Another incomplete sentence.

Current Presidents renew martial law every two years.

Ummm...no. Also, there's only one current president in the United States.
 
Ron - I have to tell you that I really really appreciate your post(s). The end of the work-day is drawing near and it hasn't been the easiest day. Your post(s) create in my body, mind, and spirit, quite a light mood.


You make me smile (day in, day out) thank you for inspiring the forum participants.

wethankyou.gif
 

You had said, though, that this guy was convicted of doing this in Oregon. However, as the article makes clear, this guy was a Colorado resident and was convicted for his sovereign citizen activities in Colorado. There appears to be no connection to Oregon. Now I don't doubt that if the OP were to pursue the same kinds of activity in Oregon that this guy did that he too would face criminal prosecution, but the final outcome and sentence may be different as the laws in the two states differ.
 
You had said, though, that this guy was convicted of doing this in Oregon.
Nope, that's not what I said. I said [Doucette] tried setting up a civil court in Oregon (whch he did), and was spending decades in prison for his various shenanigans. Not saying that one directly led to the other, but they sort of go hand in hand with these whack jobs.
 
Nope, that's not what I said. I said [Doucette] tried setting up a civil court in Oregon (whch he did), and was spending decades in prison for his various shenanigans. Not saying that one directly led to the other, but they sort of go hand in hand with these whack jobs.

What you said earlier was:

You know the last guy to try this in Oregon is serving 38 years for his shenanigans.

And that clearly conveys that the guy was sentenced for activities he did in Oregon. That may not be what you meant, but if you read it as someone who didn't know what you intended I think you'll agree that your statement certainly reads as though you are connecting the two.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top