Money Gram

Sillynuttyme

New Member
Jurisdiction
Maryland
I needed to wire money to Africa, so I went to money gram. I misspelled the name and asked for a correction. They refused to do the correction and send the money simply because I refused to tell them why I wanted to send it. I don't believe any business needs to know my personal business and this was an invasion of my privacy. I signed the form that money gram would not be held responsible in case of a scam. Is there any legal action I can take to force them to change this policy? They just assumed it's a scam without any evidence.
 
I needed to wire money to Africa, so I went to money gram. I misspelled the name and asked for a correction. They refused to do the correction and send the money simply because I refused to tell them why I wanted to send it. I don't believe any business needs to know my personal business and this was an invasion of my privacy. I signed the form that money gram would not be held responsible in case of a scam. Is there any legal action I can take to force them to change this policy? They just assumed it's a scam without any evidence.

You are free to visit or call a couple lawyers to discuss your concerns.
 
I needed to wire money to Africa, so I went to money gram. I misspelled the name and asked for a correction. They refused to do the correction and send the money simply because I refused to tell them why I wanted to send it. I don't believe any business needs to know my personal business and this was an invasion of my privacy. I signed the form that money gram would not be held responsible in case of a scam. Is there any legal action I can take to force them to change this policy? They just assumed it's a scam without any evidence.
You can't force a private business to bend to your will.
 
I needed to wire money to Africa

Africa is a pretty big place. Second largest continent on Earth with about 54 different countries. Depending on how much money you were sending and the specific country where you were sending it, it's entirely possible that the wire transfer company was legally obligated to find out why you wanted to send it.

Is there any legal action I can take to force them to change this policy?

Even if the the information was not legally required, the answer is no.

You can't force a private business to bend to your will.

Actually you can. It happens all the time.

If you have enough negotiating leverage, you might be able to "force" a change, but you don't have anywhere near enough leverage to "force" a multi-million dollar company to change its policies.
 
I needed to wire money to Africa, so I went to money gram. I misspelled the name and asked for a correction. They refused to do the correction and send the money simply because I refused to tell them why I wanted to send it. I don't believe any business needs to know my personal business and this was an invasion of my privacy. I signed the form that money gram would not be held responsible in case of a scam. Is there any legal action I can take to force them to change this policy? They just assumed it's a scam without any evidence.
I'll address your question even though it's a late reply. Monetary remittances services are subject to strict regulations, commonly referred to as know your customer (KYC) or Customer Identity and Verification (CIV). They are often subject to great scrutiny because of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regulation too. If they engage in a transaction which they might suspect the possibility of ML or FT, they certainly have it within their right not to take the risk. Moneygram, Western Union and other remittances services will look terrible if a transaction they processed resulted in some nefarious activity which the news media may report them as a facilitator.
 
So I'm not entitled to any privacy. I don't see why I have to tell someone why I'm sending money to someone without proof that I'm actually doing something illegal. It's no different than saying a committed a crime that I didn't do just because someone said I did it. I don't want to tell you so you refuse to conduct business with me because there's a chance you may look bad in the news. Your guilty by news association.
 
I don't want to tell you so you refuse to conduct business with me

Any business has a right to do business on its own terms as long as it doesn't violate any anti-discrimination laws. You have a right not to do business with that business if you don't like the terms.
 
So I'm not entitled to any privacy.

You chose to do business with them. If you don't like their policies then do business elsewhere.
I think you may five similar policies elsewhere for the reasons explained above.

There are certainly more private ways to send money, but maybe not to certain locations.
 
So I'm not entitled to any privacy.

That's an absurd conclusion based on the things you've been told in this thread.

I don't see why I have to tell someone why I'm sending money to someone without proof that I'm actually doing something illegal.

You asked a company to provide you a service. As a general matter, that company is entitled to put whatever conditions it wants on it's willingness to provide that service, as long as the conditions don't violate any law. Multiple people already explained to you why the company in question might be required to obtain the requested info from you. At the end of the day, however, it's entirely up to you: you can provide the information and do business with the company or you can choose not to provide the information and decline to do business.
 
So I'm not entitled to any privacy. I don't see why I have to tell someone why I'm sending money to someone without proof that I'm actually doing something illegal. It's no different than saying a committed a crime that I didn't do just because someone said I did it. I don't want to tell you so you refuse to conduct business with me because there's a chance you may look bad in the news. Your guilty by news association.
Of course it's different. Once you ask someone else to do something for you, they have a right to protect themselves from potential harm which may be related to you. And yes, you must bear the burden of people making decisions as a result of your potential associations. If you're a close relative or friend of Osama bin Laden, then people going to be hesitant to conduct business with you for obvious reasons. The world does not revolve around anyone's desire for privacy.

Here is another example - you want a loan but your credit history presents a very high likelihood that you will not pay the money back on time and your poor record of employment suggests the same. Is a bank required to give you a loan?

Now there are laws which DO protect you from discrimination and rights of privacy. But what you are describing does not seem to fall within those laws. If a money transmitter has some valid reason to suspect that you present an unreasonable risk to them, they can refuse to transmit the funds. In fact, they are required to submit suspicious activity reports (SARs) and I'll provide for you a link as an example: Money Services Business (MSB) Suspicious Activity Reporting | FinCEN.gov

I don't know all the details of your transaction but my goal is to enlighten you on what the laws are, why they reasonably exist and what you should consider if you wish to send money with a money transmitter or "Money Service Business" or MSB such as Western Union, MoneyGram, etc.
 
Back
Top