Recent content by ThreeFatSamurai

Yes, they are. They feel it's better for the child involved. Besides I'm getting married to the military next Thursday, I don't see why they wouldn't let him sign over his rights.

Not me personally, but we do have mutual friends that can say that they have used these drugs with him and seen him take them and aderol(?)

I'm not married. I wasn't married to the father. We were, however engaged at one point in time. He didn't sign her birth certificate either.

He is NOT paying child support. When we were going to get it finalized he gave me a sob story about him and his new girlfriend (now his wife) were not going to be able to live and support the new baby if it was court ordered for him to pay me child support. So we agreed that he would pay me at...

I didn't do anything, but when he openly admitted snorting Kolonapin(?) and oxycottons(?) with my child in his care. I stopped letting her see him unless it was at his mothers house.

She was notified via mail about a week after he signed the papers. When she talked to him on the phone about it, he had told her it was because he didn't want to pay child support anymore.

I would think that if the other parent is out of work and is using his new wife's money to support his habit that they would allow to at least give me primary custody of the child. I think a simple drug test him and I would have to be done if I were to bring something like up in court, correct...

My baby's father and I have agreed that it would be best for our daughter if he signed over his rights. When I was pregnant he said I was lying about it the whole pregnancy, when I had her, he told me and his mother that our baby girl was black (Which, of course, she isn't, she's just as...