Recent content by pctechtv

Could you explain or show where this forum states that the type of questions or suggestion Redemptionman, (or any other member for that matter), is problematic as it crosses over into legal advice? Thanks

Somebody helpful at the court brought this up - New York City has implemented regulations requiring process servers to use GPS technology to record the time, date, and location of service. Reading over my Affidavit of Service (which took place in Brooklyn in November of 2020), I do not see the...

In the evidence they have sent of statements there is not one transaction there. I keep saying this part, and I will say it again... they have a document as one of their exhibits from NY State trying to tie me to the corporation that one of the accounts was opened for. It clearly states that the...

I already did. This wasnot given to me. I do not know the person. It has been explained to me that the traverse hearing will be to determine if they can continue, or will the case be dismissed based on bad service. If it allowed we will just be in headed to trail. Like I said this is identity...

At the Traverse hearing, am I aloud to show more evidence of why this service is bogus and why this claim I owe them is bogus?

I got passed the default judgment, as explained to me today.

That makes sense based on what I am seeing. Thanks

It seem like just like other companies AMEX sells the debt to companies and they get to come after and still call it AMEX for credibility.

Yes, it is my home address. However, the person is not someone I know. I have Affidavits from two people saying that he is not known to the address or neighborhood. Thanks

The plaintiff claims they left papers with a person I DO NOT KNOW. Like I said my tenant and my neighbor gave me Notarized Affidavits that state that this person is not known. However, the plaintiff is claiming a person accepted papers on my behalf but the name on them is not exactly mine. Is...

I have discovered that related to the Affidavit of Service my name on that is spelled incorrectly. I have stated and summited Affidavits from two people, one a tenant in my building, and the other a neighbor, that the person the plaintiff claims accepted service does not exist. The plaintiff has...

Up to now I have only been to court after filling the OSC. Everytime it has been ajurned for a new date. Yes, my lawyer from CLARO is appearing with me. I described what he did at the last court date. What he said... being that they were saying I paid this through my bank account. I want to be...

I am in the process. I am here asking for suggestions no how I would do that. I am assuming I can corospend with the law firm and ask them to be clear. I do not want to do things in the wrong manner and botch my chance with the court to hold them to what they are saying.

I mean the point that at court they told my lawyer... "but he paid the Amex account from his bank account". As if that is some type of proof the account is mine. My question is, which bank account? (even thourgh it seems like they do) are they allowed to just state something and it just be fact?

Can anyone give advice related to this point?