Recent content by Not Guilty$

Thank you for taking the time out of your day and sharing some valuable knowledge with me. I will try my best to avoid getting hit with any frozen fish purchased with food stamps from another state :D:D

Perfect response, the gas question wasn't related to the holding in Jones, I was just curious on how far that commerce clause could extend. Once again thank you for your very clear and direct answers! If you don't mind I do have one last question on it, if someone was to receive government aid...

US vs Jones 529 US 848 (2000) The natural gas that crosses state lines should count as federal commerce when it goes into a private dwelling correct?

Lmao, I think he meant as they could only trade a certain food and we'd only be able to purchase and eat that specific item. Because if they can control commerce wouldn't that allow them to restrict imports? Mightmoose please tell me that the federal government does NOT have the power to force...

You literally just mocked me and my post(s), I responded basically saying "if they don't want to discuss that topic then don't click it. No one is forcing them" Just seen your edit, your links didn't show before.

Remind me when I forced them to click on any of my post.

I'm not rude, people like Zinger don't contribute to a place like this. This is an obvious constitutional conversation and it could be too advanced for him which is why he started to say dumb things. This forum is literally for legal help and he says "Do your own research"

Isn't starting a discussion going to provide me with insight? I'm looking for different interpretations I can interact with. Now I'm going to assume that you have no sort of legal training so a constitutional interpretation discussion with you will go nowhere. Keep handing out pointless replies...

My class is debating it, my professor says it can be used to control what we eat. I want a different perspective on it. Do you think someone seeking legal advice would ask a question this in-depth with example cases?

I wanted to see if anyone could help me get a better understanding of the commerce clause. In Wickard v. Filburn the supreme court ruled that Filburn growing his own wheat affected the commerce clause. Here are a list of questions I am unclear about when it comes to the commerce clause: Can...

This case is all around BAD BAD news, let's get hypothetical, I'm not giving out advice and I don't know all the facts regarding this case. So let's run a hypothetical breakdown :D In this situation if he really is innocent you better start flipping pancakes quick! 1. Adult A is always moving...

Let's just hypothetically speak for a moment here. 1. If the friend gave you permission the drive the car that doesn't sound like theft. 2. Now if this person is saying you "stole" the car after they gave you permission to drive it, it could be because someones pipe was found in the car. The...

Why would a motion to dismiss the/any complaint based off it not being specific enough be unsuccessful? Could I make a complaint against you right now saying "He caused me emotional harm by calling me a liar on the internet!" Then request you pay me 5k plus pay my medical bills for the...

Well I'm going to take this as you don't know what a motion to dismiss is. Thanks for trying , hypothetically speaking I'm a not guilty kind of guy and your the sign the 20 year plea deal for stealing a Snickers bar kinda guy.

I'm a pre law student, I look at cases in my local court house during my free time and think of ways out. I saw a completed case with an issue similar to my topic post, I was wondering if it could be dismissed on the ground that the auto accident complaint wasn't specific enough. So you make...