Thank you very much for this thoughtful response. Your feedback was extremely helpful, especially the insight into just how vague and open to interpretation the language might be.
Cheers, and thanks again for taking the time.
Thanks for your input. That is certainly the plan. My hope was to simply get a better picture of the potential applicability of the language before making it a point of discussion/negotiation.
Fair enough. May I try another approach? If one were to publicly post content to their own website (appropriately attributed with respect to any potential copyrights), could that be considered synonymous with “submitting” said content to a third party for review?
I appreciate the spirit of your message, however I see dozens of posts asking for a review of much denser excerpts from all sorts of business contracts, all with thoughtful responses from the community.
This is a clause that stands on its own — as is — with no associations or references to...
Hello there!
Our company — a small advertising agency based in Los Angeles, CA — recently won a proposal to take over the digital marketing and social media management for a large online brand.
The SOW contract is surprisingly short and mostly boilerplate, but there is one clause whose...