Dealerships don't have to protect their assets?They had no proof of full coverage and they let me drive THEIR car. They are not responsible for the car in any way??? their name is on title and registration, not mine.
Every agreement to furnish insurance policy form is same. So if you have knowledge like I thought you did. You would know exactly what the form reads. So if you do not believe it says that I agreed to pay 500$deductible for premium insurance then you can look up form online to confirm.
I don't understand how I'm responsible for THEIR car. The car still had their license plate, the title is under them. No papers have been processed. Why is it my responsibility. The car is not yet in my name.
On agreement to furnish insurance policy it says " I fail to do so after 3 days I pay a deductible of 500$ and they then are suppose to add/charge me for premium coverage on my monthly car payments". Explain this. Do you have a agreement to furnish insurance policy form. Read it and then respond...
Basically Toyota thought my insurance company would cover me because my other car had full coverage. But my insurance policy had so many restrictions that Toyota and I were not aware of till the next day after purchase. So since Toyota assumed my insurance company would pay they basically lied...
You said that their coverage should kick in, but it hasn't kicked in. Toyota is saying that either I pay for the damages or they will sell the vehicle and I have to pay left over balance
On agreement to furnish insurance policy it says " I fail to do so after 3 days I pay a deductible of 500$ and they then are suppose to add/charge me for premium coverage on my monthly car payments". Explain this. Do you have a agreement to furnish insurance policy form. Read it and then...
The Toyota yaris 2015 that I purchased Saturday was a used vehicle, I also purchased 7 year warranty. Certified used Toyota. Doesnt Cover accidents. Shouldn't I receive my money back because they broke the agreement we had. They failed to protect the asset. It was not my responsibility till...
Basically Toyota thought my insurance company would cover me because my other car had full coverage. But my insurance policy had so many restrictions that Toyota and I were not aware of till the next day after purchase. So since Toyota assumed my insurance company would pay they basically lied...
After the 3 days insurance is on the buyer but before the 3 days, isn't Toyota suppose to cover the car in order to protect the product which is their asset
Toyota was suppose to give me 3 days to provide proof of full coverage. I ended up having a car accident before the 3 days. I need to know who provides coverage until the 3 days are up. Toyota knew I had liability coverage when I drove off the lot Saturday. I was supposed to add full...
Again =>Does the "agreement to furnish insurance policy form" mean that if I don't provide the insurance policy within 3 days I will have to pay for the premium insurance from the lienholders? What does the form actually saying?