Recent content by jvdub

I was just thinking of it more in the way of pissing off the wrong guy, who says "I don't care if you think its a waste of time, he made us look bad, so pursue this..."

I suppose if it were municipal or government property it may make a difference?

Makes sense to me. My feeling was that unless there was vandalism, theft, or other serious crimes, that it simply wouldn't be worth the time to pursue. Not because it wasn't possible, mostly just because the amount of effort to pursue a minor charge of trespassing like that wouldn't seem to...

I'm not sure if you're familair with the hobby in question. People go to places that are usually abandoned (examples could be old closed down hospitals or power plants) or steam tunnels at universities, or quite often a building in the midst of being decommissioned. So typically it would mean...

In regards to cases made from photos and blogs; was there any issue with establishing the evidence as legitimate? Someone specifically said this "there is no proof of you being on that property other than those pictures. Simply having pictures of a building is not enough to have charges pressed...

I appreciate the answer so quick. So, say a person had a web domain registered in their name, posted pictures of themselves on the property, and wrote explaining how they gained access to the place. Do you think, in those circumstances, they would be able to argue that it wasn't them? was all...

The question is really about the USA and Canada in general, and whether evidence taken from a person's website can be used in court as evidence of a crime. To make this clearer, "urban explorers" trespass on properties and document the visits with pictures and stories of the visit on their...