By the way, what are the chances that he is asked to prove that he has been residing in DC for at least 183 days this year? I am curious how this works.
TaxCouncel, Thank you for detailed reply and most of all, for explaining "half of their own support" rule
(d) would disqualify him.
(b) can be stretched either way but because of the (d) there is no need for it.
They rent apartments with other young people. Its not as expensive as NYC would be.
Thank you for your replies!
I have another question regarding residency and filing taxes.
The timing of his move is such that it allows him to file taxes only in DC (where his new job is located)
Does it mean that I won't he able to file him as a dependent for sure? He graduated from college...
The main question is whether or not a gap in being insured hurts someone who decides to get insured a few years later. I mean by increasing his future insurance rates
Thank you @zddoodah
My policy can't cover anyone who doesn't reside with me, that's why I said "have to remove"
Some states mandate everyone who holds a valid DL to be insured.. his new state of residence isn't one of them. It makes sense to obtain a DL in his new state
My child (21) has been on my policy since receiving his DL. Recently, he permanently moved to another state with great public transport (for work), he doesn't have or plan to have a car there in the next several years.
My undestanding is that I have to remove my adult child from my auto policy...
