He has the car. But she's harrasing him over it. He just wants to grieve and work and do his thing. He called us last night for addvice and asked us to double check his rights.
He's quite street smart, just not as articulate or booksmart. She's well off and wasn't concerned with the car untill he had interuptedbher plans to usurp him.
I know financial status means little to a judge when arguing a case. I don't expect her to sue, but I want to be ready with an answare...
The only reason I bring up his financual position is because hiring an autourny will be imposible for him. If it goes to court, and he can't convince the judge that he and his wife share everything, and to his knowlage, no such agreement was made, then he should cut his losses. If it comes to...
I assume if the daughter intended, either stated, implied, or assumed, for the car to be returned after death. And there is no written agreement, she would likely loose a civil suit.
He is not a well educated man and lives paycheck to paycheck, so a legal battle may not be possible.
Good question. He and we may have been using the word "registration" in place of the word "Title" I just asked who was on the pink slip, he said just him and his wife.
Thanks Army Judge, the car is parked on the street, and the sister may have a copy of the keys either taken from the purse or retained from previous ownership. He has changed the locks in what can barely be called a studio apartment. I wouldent put it past her to take it and park it in a red...