Recent content by atexun

cbg: Then that would lead back to my original statment that libel is not libel unless you are damaged as I certainly understand that suppostion could never be a foundation for a lawsuit. But I fail to see how forcing the issue somehow lends credence to false and defamatory statements...

So libel is libel only if you are damaged? How would you know you were damaged in some cases? Suppose those three people each repeated the same comments to three others and so on. Somewhere along the line they tell someone that you may come in contact with at a future date. Say it's a...

I have a situation where an employee has used company e-mail to send derogatory comments about me to persons outside of the company (to 3 different e-mail addresses). I don't know these people but would this still constitute libel?