Recent content by 4Justice_MD

Yes,that's right,and I meant to say,probably not prosecuted.Me,and these hands on a keyboard,lol.

One thing you should keep in mind is that "warrants" never expire.regardless of a statue of limitations,so yes,you can still be arrested,just nor prosecuted.Even so,a statute of limitations have numerous rules that apply to them,and they can be what is known as "tolled"(the clock stops running)...

We really can't advise you to much here,based on what you "think."Maybe you are being investigated,maybe not,but it sounds to me,that,if anything were to come of it,you've already gotten out in front of it,with these supporting documents,and your aunt word that she had given you permission to...

He wants to go it alone,and represent himself,which is so not in his best interest.

WOW,!way to go there,just look at you. You think,you really answered the OP's questions,with the link you provided,and yet nothing in the law relates to anything he ask,asking how he should best defend himself,and the burden of proof that he mentioned,which btw,all relates to Criminal...

Btw... if your so concerned that by posting the link on here,that the OP will somehow be confused,maybe even loose his case,Why don't you trouble yourself to look the Washington C.P Codes,and find the specific procedures regarding TPO's,and come back and post it,otherwise,quit criticizing me for...

Well number one,iI'm the one doing the posting so,it kinda my decision what I post,and how,I choose to post it,whether you like it or not,matters not to me. Number two,the link,I provided,as already stated gives the OP,some "general guidance,as to the kind of hearing his case will be presented...

In quoting me,it apparent,you forgot this part of the post I added,when I posted the link.The link of course,was just to give the OP,some 'general guidance,hence the part about Washington,using a different standard of proof,but thank you for such great input.:D SMH:

you are right,but in the context of a TPO hearing,which is not quite a criminal proceeding,and not quite a civil one either,the "standard of proof," may only be what is known as by a "preponderance of the evidence," standard,which is just above,a finding of "probable cause." Putting this in more...

Hello there Sir: I can see your understanding of how TPO's work is very limited,but that's alright,we are here to help. The first thing you need to understand,is that once a TPO has been issued as it was,based on probable cause,no contact means,"NO CONTACT."This usually includes,by...

LOL,How bout you do the same,Mr."Crystal Ball man,like,I didn't know,who you meant that for.sorry,but if you can't take it,don't dish it out,and i really don't care if you desire to respond to any of my future posts,Respect for "all" members on here,is a two-way street,At least,I was man enough...

your a smart man/woman,go back through my post,very "slowly" now,and I just believe,It'll come to you.now,let me know when you got it,SMH.

Now here's a nice twist on Justice "Teenager Shoplifting In Costume Store forced To Hold Sign Out The Front,Saying,He Got Caught(while in costume,of course) This is AdHoc Justice on display,literally.Shoplifter in Halloween Express forced to hold sign out the front saying he got caught (while...

Even if you didn't it has been,and still is your sole focus. Traditionally,it has always been in civil matters where a Plaintiff seeks compensation in a damage suit,to be able to prove their damages/loss in a court of law.The only issue that should be of any relevance in the context of...

For me,all where saying on here,circles back around to "Deterrence."how can society best be served in deterring these thieves.I say criminal prosecution,and in that regard,let's get tougher with our laws on shoplifters through increased penalties ,especially for 'repeat offenders,and let's start...