This article provides a brief overview on Texas law concerning post-divorce alimony in Texas.  Laws differ from state to state and individual circumstances vary, so you should consult with a qualified family law attorney in your area for specific advice on your particular situation.  Additionally, this article deals only with post-divorce alimony.  It does not address temporary alimony, which is provided for under a different provision of the Texas Family Code.

Two Kinds of Alimony:  Contractual and Court Ordered Maintenance

There are two kinds of post-divorce alimony in Texas:  contractual alimony and court ordered maintenance.  The Texas Family Code also provides authority for the court to order temporary alimony which occurs while a divorce is pending.  However, temporary alimony is outside the scope of this article and will not be addressed.

Contractual Alimony

Contractual alimony is based on an agreement between the parties in their divorce decree.  For tax purposes, contractual alimony is normally deemed income to the receiving party and is deductible from the income of the paying party.  Since contractual alimony must be based on an agreement of the parties, there are no limits to the possible amount or duration of the alimony.   

Court Ordered Maintenance

Court ordered maintenance is provided for by Texas Family Code Chapter Eight.  Although actually awarded in only a small percentage of Texas divorces, the court has the right to order one spouse to pay the other post-divorce maintenance in either of two circumstances:

The payor spouse either received deferred adjudication or was convicted of a crime constituting family violence within two years of the filing of the divorce case, or the parties have been married at least ten years and the receiving spouse has some kind of financial limitation (disability, unable to work because caring for the party's child, or lacks earning ability to meet minimum reasonable needs).

The monthly amount of court ordered maintenance is capped at the lesser of: a) $2,500 or b) 20% of the monthly payor's gross income. The maximum duration of court ordered maintenance is three years.  The only exception is when maintenance is ordered as the result of a disability, in which case the duration can potentially extend indefinitely.

Considerations

Where there is a large disparity in incomes alimony can sometimes be used as a useful settlement tool.  Since alimony is generally taxable to the receiving party and deductible to the paying party it can be often structured so that it is advantageous to both parties. For example, a party in a high tax bracket can agree to make monthly alimony payments in exchange for a more favorable property division.  If the receiving party is in a lower tax bracket, the overall income tax paid could be significantly lower than what it would be otherwise.

Another factor to consider is how rarely Texas trial courts order maintenance, absent an agreement.  The statute allows for maintenance only when the specific statutory circumstances have been proven.  There are several appellate cases that have reversed trial court decisions ordering maintenance when the requesting party did not provide sufficient proof that the standard had been met. In cases where there is a large amount of community property, one of the most effective arguments in attempting to defeat a maintenance claim is that the requesting party will have ample resources to provide for the party's needs since he or she will receive a significant amount of assets from the division of property.

Another common argument used to defeat a maintenance claim is that, during the pendency of the divorce, the requesting party has not made significant attempts to either obtain employment or obtain training that would allow the party to obtain employment.

As an example, lets take a divorce case where the wife is requesting maintenance on the grounds that the marriage is longer than ten years and that she lacks the earning ability to meet her minimum reasonable needs. If, at the time of trial after the case has been pending for several months, she has made no effort to obtain employment or improve her job skills, it will be a difficult claim to succeed upon.  The court is unlikely to find that she is "unable" to meet her reasonable minimum needs and more likely to believe that she is unwilling to take the necessary steps in order to provide for her own support.

Conclusion

Alimony in Texas, while rarely ordered, is an important and complicated issue.  It can be used as an effective settlement tool and can potentially be a significant trial issue.  For someone involved in a Texas divorce case with a potential alimony issue, the issue should be discussed in detail with an experienced divorce lawyer.



About The Author

Scott Morgan is a Texas attorney who practices exclusively in the field of divorce and family law in the Houston area.  For more information on Texas divorce law, see Mr. Morgan's  website at http://www.texas-divorce-info.com.  It provides articles, information, a free newsletter, and other resources on the subject of Texas divorce and family law.

Submit your opinion on this article below or submit your own article!

Comments (4) >>

Recovering lost wages
written by IV on September 20, 2006

after 16 years and 7 children, due to multiple affairs, my spouse has left me and file for divorce. I was the main bread winner and put him through to school. After I had children I was asked to stay home for the sake of the children, while allowing him to continue to pursue his career. Let me point out that I wanted to go back to work. My questions is, can I recover lost wages, or the earning potential, as part of the alimony agreement?

gettingmylifeback

...
written by a guest on October 02, 2006

i need your advice what should i do?

medical costs
written by a guest on December 30, 2006

my ex-wife according to our divorce agreement is responsible to pay half of the cost of medical insurance and unreimbursed medical expenses but refuses to do so-i filed a contempt motion several years ago-the results were that she would agree to mediation of the health bills but after leaving court and one visit to the mediator (we each met separately) she refused to further participation

Auto
written by Grace partida on January 09, 2007

I purchased a new auto in june 2006 ever since then I have had so many repairs as well as a new transmission put in and it has a problem they say it does not and i recorded the sound and a mechanic says I should forfiet my contract with them.do i have a case?

Write comment

Name

Title

Comment

Add Comment