05-03-2012, 01:42 PM #1
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Arresting officer failed to appear
Jurisdiction / State: Georgia
I was arrested under "suspicion of DUI" 4 yrs ago. I hired an attorney to fight it as whole thing was a sham from start to finish. The arresting officer lied on the report and said I refused the breathalizer, when in fact, I took the test 5 times. He couldnt get a reading. Long story short, 3 yrs ago I received a Decision from the Court that "arresting officer failed to appear at the call of the case. The action of the Respondent (Dept of Driver Services) is therefore REVERSED." What does this mean? A couple attorneys told me it means they dropped the case. Is this true?
I just don't understand the legal jargon.
05-03-2012, 03:40 PM #2
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Hanford, CA
- Thanked 621 Times in 613 Posts
If your license was automatically suspended due to the arrest then the suspension reversed.
Yes, it seems the case was either dropped or their window to prosecute closed.
For the record, failure to perform a test properly is considered a refusal to test. Some people wont blow long enough or try to obstruct airflow with the tongue, etc. If after 5 tries the officer believed you were not following instructions it would go down as a refusal. At that point they should have gotten a blood sample.
At any rate, it seems you lucked out.
By dmtrust in forum Estate Administration & Probate CourtReplies: 2Last Post: 11-13-2009, 08:07 AM
By free1ancer in forum Small Claims & Municipal CourtReplies: 7Last Post: 11-20-2008, 07:08 PM
By WyoGal in forum Employment, Labor, Work IssuesReplies: 7Last Post: 10-07-2007, 05:40 PM
By jmk101 in forum Law School & Careers in LawReplies: 0Last Post: 04-16-2007, 02:58 PM
Consumer Law, Warranties failed promisesBy Botard in forum Consumer Law, Contracts, WarrantiesReplies: 1Last Post: 07-30-2001, 02:48 AM