Ask a Legal Question
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Laid Off due to Illness

    My jurisdiction is: Massachusetts/ Worcester

    I have worked for this company for five years. During the last year I had begun to get sick. Small symptoms at first joint pain, morning nausea, bad headaches. Then coworkers started to notice the limp from the joint pain in my legs and my skin color became white almost translucent, I also lost a lot of weight. I continued to work past the pain didn't take many days off, I tried to see my doctor before work or during lunch breaks. I liked my job and the people I worked with, I just needed to find out what was wrong with me. In September of 06 my boss wanted to speak to me, and he told me I was getting laid off, I would recieve six weeks severance pay and full unemployment pay. I couldn't get a reason for being laid off and concentrated on getting well. With the free time I started seeing my Doctor daily and after a few weeks we discovered a brain tumor that was damaging my pituitary gland which was causing the problems. Two surgeries later and the tumor was removed. I am still unemployed and thinking that I was unjustly terminated from my job.


  2. Registered User Distinguished Colleague
    Green_Hornet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    618
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 39 Times in 39 Posts
    Can you reapply when your healed?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    When I was told I was to be laid off I was givin a couple of weeks to help the consulting company that was taking my place. I haven't called to ask for my job back. There were no arrangements made when I left that my job would be held open for me. I hope this answers your question.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Samaritan & Scholar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    5,393
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 380 Times in 372 Posts
    Sorry I didn't see this initially. I have a couple of questions.

    1.) What reason were you given for the layoff?

    2.) Were others laid off at the same time you were?

    3.) How many employees does your employer have within a 75 mile radius?

    4.) Had there been any complaints about your performance?

    I'm thinking in a couple of different directions here.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    1. When I first started with the company there were 3 branches and a corporate site. Around the time I was let go it was near 20, I believe the reason was because the company had grown to the point where they needed a consultant company to handle my area.

    2. As the company was growing I was able to hire someone to work for me. He is still with the company. (or was after I was gone)

    3. The company manages nursing homes so if we include all of the nurses and admin people over 1000.(Website says 2600) Some sites they managed others they owned.

    4. None. I was usually praised for my work at review time and was given increases every year.

  6. #6
    Super Moderator Samaritan & Scholar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    5,393
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 380 Times in 372 Posts
    You haven't really answered #2. I'm less concerned with whether your assistant is still there, as with whether there were other employees who were laid off at the same time.

    However, I noticed something I missed the first time round, and that is that this happened nearly three years ago. Even if you did initially have a claim, which is still not clear, it's likely that you've waited too long to do anything about it now.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    No one else was laid off when I was. I realize that it has been 3 years since it happened, I just came across this site and always wondered if I should have done something. Of course it would have taken almost a year for me to try and fight it, getting well was job one. Sorry if I wasted anyones time.

  8. #8
    Registered User Learned Member
    theretoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    northern ca
    Posts
    296
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
    you were not offered fmla and it could possibly fall into disability discrimination with eeoc. contact your local us department of labor office and file a complaint with eeoc as well as the mass office of disability

    http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=eohhs2to...es&sid=Eeohhs2

  9. #9
    Registered User Esteemed Colleague

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    north of Pittsburgh
    Posts
    845
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 55 Times in 55 Posts
    Well, the EEOC is not part of the Dept of Labor. Alleged FMLA violations are handled by the DOL. The EEOC handles discrimination complaints.

    Secondly, the window for filing a complaint with the federal EEOC is LONG past. Such claim must be filed within 180 days (extended to 300 days if charge is also covered by state or local anti-discrimination laws).
    http://www.eeoc.gov/charge/overview_charge_filing.html

  10. #10
    Registered User Learned Member
    theretoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    northern ca
    Posts
    296
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
    my statement does not state that the dol and eeoc are one in the same, but it is important to remember that a denial or failure to notify an employee of their fmla rights could very well fall into disability discrimination as fmla can be used as a 'reasonable accomodation' for a disability.

    http://www.e-hresources.com/Articles/Sept2.htm

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North Arkansas
    Posts
    33
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Here's my take on this >>>> Your employer was generous in allowing you to file uncontested unemployment benefits since an applicant must be able to work in order to qualify. Additionally, an employer should terminate any employee whom is no longer able to perform the job they were hired to do. This also applies to employees injured on the job and becomes a workman's comp issue. I don't know of any labor law statute that creates accomodations for lite duty work on an interim basis.

  12. #12
    Registered User Learned Member
    theretoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    northern ca
    Posts
    296
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
    ada requires that an employer provide 'reasonable accomodations' to an employee with known disabilities; workers comp requires that an employee be classified as a 'qualified injured worker' or permanently, completely disabled before seperation from the company can be considered.

  13. #13
    Super Moderator Samaritan & Scholar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    5,393
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 380 Times in 372 Posts
    Show me a single instance where the EEOC determined that failure to notify of FMLA rights qualified as disability discrimination under the ADA.

    In other words, put your money where your mouth is.

  14. #14
    Registered User Learned Member
    theretoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    northern ca
    Posts
    296
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts

  15. #15
    Registered User Distinguished Colleague
    Green_Hornet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    618
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 39 Times in 39 Posts
    OK I see what theretoo is saying. The employer could be liable under both the FMLA,as well as the ADA. Here is how if the employer failed to grant FMLA leave to the eligible employee who also has a qualifying disability under the ADA. The employee could sue under both laws.

    This is how: The employees attorney can file directly in U.S court under the FMLA (DOL action is not required), the attorney could have the client file a complaint to the EEOC under the ADA, at which time the client requests a right to sue letter, the EEOC will give a right to sue letter as soon as the client requests it after filing the complaint. The attorney in that case can sue under both theory's of law in a single case. It happens frequently.
    Last edited by Green_Hornet; 09-12-2009 at 07:09 PM.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last

Similar Threads

  1. Bank denies theft due to date expiration of claim
    By mtjoseph in forum Banking, Finance, Investments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-31-2009, 11:35 AM
  2. Laid Of, Severance and rights
    By jp27jojo in forum Employment, Labor, Work Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-15-2009, 02:31 PM
  3. Wrongfully Laid Off
    By ka0228 in forum Termination: Firing & Resignation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-04-2008, 10:29 AM
  4. I evacuated due to Ike, and was reprimanded.
    By brittbritt22 in forum Discrimination & Sexual Harassment
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-26-2008, 12:01 PM
  5. Manager has spoken to work colleagues about my illness
    By angelala in forum Employment, Labor, Work Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-07-2008, 07:27 PM

Log in

Log in