Ask a Legal Question
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Not guilty in court but info used for dismissal

    Hi All,

    A question from the UK here, regarding a friend of mine (no really) who I feel has been treated unfairly - just hoping there are some UK law-gurus on here too!

    Basically E was arrested for shoplifting, an allegation he denied. He duly went to court where he was found NOT guilty. E's manager had attended court with him to *offer support*... During the hearing E's previous convictions were mentioned: both were Public Order Act offences (section 4, section 5) and both were spent, having occurred when E was a juvenile, some 17 years ago!

    E's manager went back to the HR department and informed them of E's 'previous', whereupon they dismissed him. The reasons? 1) Failing to mention convictions (spent, spent, spent!) and 2) The HR director said that, despite being found NOT guilty it was her opinion that E had intended to steal goods!



    I'm incredulous as I know that this is hugely, fundamentally wrong - but I don't know the legalities (I'm thinking Data Protection Act? Rehabilitation of Offenders Act??). E has his appeal on Tuesday so any advice would be HUGELY gratefully received.

    Thanks all ~ have a great weekend.

    Ria

  2. Super Moderator Honorable Scholar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,310
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 80 Times in 80 Posts
    I'm incredulous as I know that this is hugely, fundamentally wrong

    I agree; your friend should not have lied.
    Be not niggardly of what costs thee nothing, as courtesy, counsel, & countenance.

    Ben Franklin

Log in

Log in