Alligator Alley

[Ziggy]

Irish223,

Yep I agree, glad I came back to check on this reply, if I told a friend to come here and check out my post, wow! Wacko-Tobacco !
I think we have a beat-nick poet out of the fifties, . .

Thats what the weed with roots in hell will do to you after awhile.

I think archie has nerve though to bring this wacko weed bull to the law forum. It serves as a reminder, I'd hate to drop a spark on that pile of powder.

Oh well, maybe I'll request a deletion, after I decide that I'll never figure out exactly what point he is making.
Who, knows maybe he knows me from somewhere, and he figures he's, deep down through his abuse he's probably jealous and tormented with the fact that I am a successful designer in the aviation industry. I have a couple of those who belong in Sing-Sing but are still running around.

Yeah, this case, their still after me for loads of money.

The thing is it is pretty much about business financing regardless of how you raise the money as long as it's legal.

That's what I did, and put in the area, give or take 250,000
in five years.

It is about Helicopter Search and Rescue equipment, and patents and copyrights and technology commercialization.

The thing is in something like this your competitors would have a tough time getting away with the whole anchellotta,
without contracting with the government. I guess they could work in secret, while you worked your way into the insane asylum or the grave, then surprise the government with a contract that they also secretly lobbied with cronies behind closed doors.

I have submitted a request to the US Attorneys Office in Virginia to look this over. Because it would do me a lot of good to find out what is new in the helicopter industry as far as Federal Procurement is concerned.

Well, I have not received much back in the way of answers lately, other than 3-4 e-m letters ago I requested a status check and was told that this was submitted to the appropriate fraud investigations office.

Meanwhile, I had some serious inquiries as to who would purchase my house to save me a few bucks on the foreclosure, that was the first one, since then on the second, I requested a trial about the collection, Pressler and Pressler apparently had a little more influence then I did, I received a letter from the courts after I paid the trial fee, and they set a date for the trial, they decided that I did not have to show up on the court date, since there was not going to be a trial, and that since I did not request an oral argument ?? My thoughts were why would I need an oral argument if I had a jury trial.

I was going to tell the jury, the debt was mine but the cause wasn't and that I wanted to bring the creditors together in a bankruptcy and to discuss the capabilities of a pay back but first the fraud inquiry and the do-diligence concerning such would have to happen first.

Well, anyway I have a bunch of stuff on my desk and it's got me a little down, but I know if I live long enough I'll be right, and I'll prove it! period.
Dirt doesn't float to the top, . . does it ? I am thinking the truth does.
I would like to sue this ten billion dollar company for 100,000,000 sound like maybe I'm joking but I am not kidding. They put me through a living hell ! These people abuse the right to
the extent of dishonor. They're cold blooded !

I have a blog, but there is non of this stuff on it and I don't want the Archies of this world to go there. If your interested send me a PM.

[archie009]

Irish223 thats my first real try at posting at any fourm and no I don't no you or want your money . you said to need more details so I did heres something that might help you see the light. Go and search under electronic harrassment and youll see people all over the world in every city and town and state that this is happening to. I hope your not to closed minded on things. thanks for the reply

[Ziggy]

Archie,
I think that you must be misunderstanding this post, . .however we will need to carry on a conversation in another post, I will look into this forum and see if there is a cafe lounge or something. I need to close, . . . another time and another place.

But thats interesting I check it out on my next shift.

[irish223]

Archie, you are not clear as to what kind of help or advice you need. Unless you are more specific in your request, I doubt you'll get any other response.

[Ziggy]

Six months have past, since Archie came along and created confusion in my thread, Oh well, there's one in every crowd.

I may or may not have mentioned that I wrote to the U.S. Attorney's Office,

concerning a fraud investigation, after many attempts at finding out what the status of the information I sent was in the last year, this is a duplicate excerpt;

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
From:
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:35:11 AM
To: USAVAE-PRESS (USAVAE)
Subject: Previous Communication
Auto forwarded by a Rule
Jim Rybicki
Public Information Officer
Phone: (703)842-4050 Fax: (703)549-5202
E-Mail: usavae.press@usdoj.gov
Website: www.usdoj.gov/usao/vae

Dear Jim Ricki,
This is in reference to the two letters I have sent you on August 28 2007, concerning my dealings and association with the Textron Financial Corporation.
Have you or will you look into this ?
Regards,
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
From: Rybicki, James (USAVAE)
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 6:37 PM
Subject: FW: Previous Communication

I have forwarded your previous to our Fraud Unit who will forward it to the appropriate investigative agency.

Thanks,
Jim Rybicki
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Dear Sir,
For my personal information, If I may ask you again, . .
What, "appropriate investigative agency", did you forward previously mentioned information(s), to ?
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
To: Rybicki, James (USAVAE)
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Previous Communication

Dear Sir,
For my personal information, If I may ask you again, . .
What, "appropriate investigative agency", did you forward previously mentioned information(s), to ?
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
To: USAVAE.VAR@usdoj.gov
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:35 AM
Subject: Previous Communication
Dear DoJ Personel,
Please tell me, . . Is there any way to get a responce to my previous request ? I have made repeated attempts to obtain an answer to a rather simple question.
/////////////////////
From: USAVAE-VAR
To: JP
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: Previous Communication

As I did not see the information you provided to Mr. Rybicki and because Mr. Rybicki is no longer here, will you please forward me the information? I do not know if it even pertains to our District. If it is forwarded to an investigative agency, we will provide you with that agency’s name.
Thank you,
Kim Ulmet, Victim/Witness Specialist
US Attorney’s Office – EDVA
/////////////////////////////////
To: USAVAE-VAR
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: Previous Communication
Kim Ulmet,
Thank you for your reply, I am curious if Mr. Rybicki, would have kept a log concerning his daily business, wouldn't this be routine ?

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
For your information in the case you may be interested,
The projects I submitted to Textron of Bell Helicopter at that time, (5), five years ago, involved, the following product project;

http://rotorheadforums.com/index.php?topic=146.0

[Ziggy]

You may have read this thread, its pretty messed up and might seem rambly,

but take my word for it its for real, what I have here is I did some business with Textron Financial Corporation and they are owned by Bell Helicopter, and they managed to pull the rug out from under me.

I sunk time and 250,000$ worth of blood sweat and tears into this startup,
I believe they hood winked me.

I was submitting to them my business plan as it was being developed, thinking that they would be impressed, and I wanted them to be, and I trusted them.

They offered to have an in house business consultant review my plan.

The technologies I submitted to them were as follows;

http://i41.tinypic.com/mwctn8.jpg

If you wish you may view the topic at the Rotorhead forum;

http://rotorheadforums.com/index.php....msg624#msg624

This was only one of the technology Products I submitted.

The other was an equipment technology, and is not convenient for my to discuss this in a public forum, however I can tell you its value as an asset begins at 100 Mill. Sale Value

I would prefer to have a Japanese firm that is familiar with International LAW,

I am looking for a firm that would be interested in representing me on a consignment basis, and will consider what ever terms they have.

It does not have to be a Japanese firm, however it is my preference.

Please spread the word around.

Support Fair Play for the Little People, Who Are the Reason We Had a Great Country !

"Nothing Ventured - Nothing Gained"

[Ziggy]

I'd like to know the Federal Legal Limit of Stature, for a claim of Financial Crime, regarding the indebtedness incurred.

Of all the debts that I incurred, the one that did not request repayment was the financial corporation that was owned by the helicopter company that I originally stated had caused the credit failure.



The question arises why did they not make an attempt to collect, . . my answer is that if they had then they would still be within the legal limit of stature, . . which would mean that I would have been able to substantiate my complaint of criminal misconduct.

Therefore if there is a question here on my part and they did not make an attempt to collect the debt
for that purpose then are they in contempt of the stature by committing yet another
crime, which would be that of conspiracy to obscure evidence, or the like of it ?

My debt to them was about 35,000, they are a defense contractor, the technology they knew was in my possession was not only a helmet ), which is one of the products their company is a manufacturer of, but not the model I designed), but a rescue line stabilizer technology that would effect all SAR helicopters in the future.
As it contributes "5" advantages that do not presently exist. This company could easily negotiate with other company's and shelf the technology as a very valuable asset.

What reason would a Financial Corporation belonging to a Helicopter company have for not collecting a debt of this size ?